by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

16

DispatchBulletinCampaign

by The Regional Nation of The Northern Light. . 160 reads.

Vote Against GA resolution Forensics Accord


General Assembly Vote Recommendation

Part of the Information for WA Voters program

Resolution at Vote: Forensics Accord
Vote Recommendation: Against

Resolution Analysis
Forensics Accord is a poorly-written proposal that was submitted with virtually no drafting. Firstly, its title is misleading as it suggests the proposal is about forensics in general, when it exclusively covers "forensic genetics". Another major flaw of the proposal is that it does not mandate any action from nations, as its clauses only "encourage", "welcome" or "emphasize" certain things, meaning it is essentially useless and arguably has no area of effect. Its category of health is also arguably incorrect, as it does not fit the description. Furthermore, the proposal is ironically full of both vague undefined terms and unnecessary definitions. It defines the word "forensics", which is not used at all in the rest of the text, while its other definition is for "impunity", a word used only once. The vague term "forensic genetics", which is used multiple times, is undefined, while other terms such as "international sentient law" or "sentient rights international law" are unclear and/or grammatically incorrect.

For the above reasons, the ministry urges a vote Against this proposal.

LinkJoin our discussion!



Sponsored by the LinkMinistry of World Assembly Affairs of The North Pacific.

RawReport