by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

5

DispatchBulletinCampaign

by 10ki wa secretariat. . 33 reads.

SC "Commend Singapore No2" Voting Overview


Current Proposal: Commend Singapore No2

Overview

Proposal:
This proposal aims to commend Singapore No2 for their contributions to the issues community, as well as securing their region from foreign invasion.

Opinions:

For:

Junitaki-cho wrote: You might remember this proposal from about a week ago, when we had some discussion about the then-queued commendation here. In response to various feedback, Honeydew redacted the submission and spent quite a bit of time over the holidays workshopping it. And the effort shows! The newly revised text is much more flavourful, opting to take several of Singapore's authored issues and use them to weave a narrative of them as an international problem-solving diplomat. I don't see a lot of reason to break it down in detail since it functions surprisingly well from start to end and, to my knowledge, doesn't contain any glaring inaccuracies.

In case you didn't follow the initial discussion, this commendation is being made on the basis that Singapore No2, in addition to whatever sitewide presence they've had, has authored 28 issues. That's about as commendable as you can get. The question is whether this does them justice, and I'm much more inclined to say yes than I was a week ago.

Cretox state wrote:For. I like it more than the previous version.

Chimes wrote: As I said on the original draft - I do believe the nominee is commendable, their contributions to issues are exemplary and they are one of the most decorated non-editor issues authors in the game. The issues in the first draft have been resolved - much more content, not a laundry list, and provides are much more thorough and detailed arguement for their commendation.

Against:

The Secretariat was unable to find any votes against.

Abstain

New Goldman wrote:I will leave it to the rest of the voters to decide. I'm mostly in between on this one. Taking part in resolving 20+ issues between regions, especially a war mongering one, is a feat on its own, and is definitely deserving a commendation. However, I don't like how the resolution presents it's points. It looks like just bunched all of the reasons together, and did not lay them out in an orderly matter.
I'll be leaving it to the rest, as previously said. I'll be therefore abstaining from voting.


10ki wa secretariat

RawReport