The Proposal’s mentioning of Repeal: "Liberate Esquerda" as logically equivalent to that of Utopia’s and therefore requiring no community consent is false because one resident, even if not in leadership, has stated that they don’t want the liberation removed.

Even if we consider Unibot as the author and assume no community assent was given, this reckless tiptoeing of ambiguity between assent and implication cannot pass as if to create some arbitrary fault line in the standards for any other repeal of a liberation. It sends a bad precedent for future SC Proposals that may be held to the same rigor especially for the sake of underlying political convenience. The implications therefore vast outweigh the author itself even if they are OOC problematic.

The Proposal speaks well informed points, but the inability to explicitly address basic standards for a repeal is not what we expected from the co-author in particular and definitely does not do the SC authors before them justice. We encourage Britons to vote AGAINST this Resolution.