«12. . .520521522523524525526. . .1,0731,074»
Yeeeeaaah I feel like both regions are nearing total collapse. Goddamn Vibrants.
I am very moral in my belives, perhaps too much, but I was brought up in a Presbyterian family, I was homeschooled, and had very little contact with social media, so yes, I am a little on the too moral side, but I think topics like that should be on a TG chat, but I do agree with you, there are a lot of health problems with that sort of perversion of the natural order that God has given us. Yes, I do know that sounds very bigoted and very Christian, but it is the truth. Also, thanks for the opportunity to put some ideas forward, I will try to do that.
I don't know the names of diseases in English, but you just need to have a little logic. You are a very smart guy to understand that this place is for expelling, not introducing. It's our drainpipe. The risks in doing this practice and catching diseases are greater. People can hurt the place and feces can get into the blood, and you know the ending... There are many problems in do it, but as I said I'm just warning. I dont care what people does in private 😁
Religious need to remove that veil and talk about these issues. There is no problem talking about sex, drinking beers, smoking, etc. Sure, everything is a risk, but what is life without them?
Well, part of it is sex is a private affair, and not something that needs to be in movies and TV shows. Second, we do not believe that sex, beer, gambling, and other things are bad, merely that we as sinners abuse the good things God has given us, and distort the relationships around us, such as; infidelity, drunkenness, which leads to violent behavior, spendthrift life, gambling away all income, among other things. This is what I am opposed to, and that is what I think is not worthy to be in our hallowed RMB chat, and I think this should be for higher debates than the prevention of anal sex.
Merther and Brazika
I have not, brother.
At any rate, you have already answered your own question leaving me befuddled as to why you asked it in the first place. In regards to the EU, I was not referring to that deplorable cabal in any way. I spoke of the nations of Europe collectively, true, but not in reference to the so-called "Union". Regardless you should not conflate the situation of an entire nation with your personal, anecdotal experiences. That is quite ignorant.
Brother you are aware that sexually transmitted diseases can be acquired through any sexual activity involving genitalia, yes? It is not something unique to anal sex. Though yes, anal sex does indeed increase the likelihood of acquiring them. But the existence of the condom renders that fact rather moot, does it not? It does after all decrease the risk of acquiring STDs substantially if not outright eliminating the risk entirely.
Though as you have said, it is a private affair.
Sexual activity is part of basic human being and I will never understand the Conservative Christian mentality of being so ashamed of it. I find Augustinian and Puritan viewpoints to be rather unnatural, frankly.
I agree, and that is how God made us, he made man and woman to be together, and he wants us to enjoy pleasures in life. However, in our human nature, we tend to be promiscuous and unfaithful in our relationships, and pervert the order of which we were made. Unfortunately, Augustine, and the later Catholic church pushed in the opposite direction, and said that it was an evil, and to be avoided by those of a higher calling. This too is not what God called us to do, he did not separate Adam from Eve, but he did, in a sense, married them, and put them in a state of relationship. Sexual Immorality is when we stray from our partners, or we have premarital sex, and enter into an "illegal relationship" for lack of a better term, and commit a false commitment. The reason that this hurts God is that marriage is an analogy of our relationship with God, and breaking our fidelity is the same as worshiping idols. Dont get me wrong, sex is a gift from God, and He does not want us to be chaste or never marry, but he wants us to be faithful in the relationships that we enter into.
What I am wanting say its wrong. The pratic is bad to body. Just that. Fashmaster You being a moral guy and presenting a new faith should be more rational in these matters. 👍🏼
As I already said a guy who advises you to do things that damage the body is unreliable. If you're one of those guys, "Do what you want. There's gotta be law." I'm going to pick on you here with this new "religion". 😁
Post self-deleted by P0rtvgal.
To actually be defending anal- hole-ee sh1t!
I'm gonna info dump on that as soon as I find that sht.
Which could take a week or two because it's been a long time since I've seen that one wall of text and links I'm think of right now.
You should stand up for circumcision too dude that'd be super dope bro
Not prevention, information.
Brazika and Anarcho-fascists
Brother, you seem to have some sort of problem with understanding what I am saying. You are attacking arguments I never made; putting words in my mouth. Perhaps I am not explaining it correctly, or perhaps you are simply too stubborn to understand what I am saying? Regardless if you're going to continue doing this then I do not see any reason to continue discussing anything with you. There is no point is discussing anything with someone who either cannot understand - or refuses to understand - what I am saying.
Calm down and clear your head. You're ranting and raving about things that we more or less agree on, yet fail to see this and instead seem to be misinterpreting my arguments to be in favor of something entirely alien and contrary to what I believe. Worst still you are doing it quite condescendingly, which is frankly just insulting and unnecessary.
I am saying no such thing. You've shifted the goalposts entirely; one minute you're talking about disease, the next the physical body. Which is it? Elaborate. Explain. You are being vague in your arguments.
And frankly your grasp of English needs work because I often find myself struggling to understand what you are saying which can easily result in miscommunication.
Seriously did you notice my English mistakes? I think you were the first one in my entire stay here. 👍🏼
As I already told here, you can just not quote me so you don't struggle to understand me, okay?
That's why I said that. Some people dont accept this and for that reason I ask people doesnt to quote if they don't like the criticism. I'm a bit "liberal" myself on these rmb issues if you didn't notice. As long as I don't insult the other's mother or meaningless fights, I won't touch my swors on anyone.
And if you have a criticism in my posts or my way of being, you can quote without hesitating 😁
You're right. It is ignorant of me. In future I'll stick to State sponsored 'statistics' and the BBC and The Guardian to formulate my opinions rather than rely on my personal anecdotal experience and of these around me. What was I thinking?
Have you had friends who've been to FE before dude? You're line of thinking seems familiar.
My "line of thinking"? You mean reason? I would hope that reason was common enough in the world that you'd have encountered it before.
Brother, the city of London has a population of almost 9,000,000. The United Kingdom as a whole has a population of almost 68,000,000. That is not even a quarter of the total population of the entire country. Applying your own experiences in London to the nation as a whole is simply... stupid. There is no more polite way of putting it, it is simply stupid to conflate the situation in a single city - one, single city - to that of the entire country. Have you even ever been outside London? Anywhere else? York? Manchester? Oxford? Edinburgh? Cardiff? Belfast? Cornwall? The Isle of Mann? Literally anywhere else in the country? Can you honestly tell me that - if you have - that it was the exact same everywhere else just as it was in London?
You cannot, because that is not possible. New York City has a composition of just 44% Whites (including European immigrants), total. That means 56% of the city's population is non-White, including Latinos, Blacks, Asians, Indians, and so on. If we are to apply that statistic nation-wide - as you have done for London and the UK - it would suggest that the USA is comprised mostly of non-Whites, and that Whites are in fact the minority. But this is not the case. The White American population stands in an overwhelming majority at 73.1% According to your "logic" we should disregard the statistics because they don't conform to your worldview.
Very well then. You say the statistics are wrong? Prove it. Where is your evidence? Present it and prove me wrong. Prove that the statistics are being manipulated. Surely if you are so certain that these statistics are wrong then you must have proof beyond "Well, I live in London and there are a lot of non-Whites here therefor it must be the same all over the country"?
Referring you back to my original post, I Ireferenced London, Paris and Brussels but yeah I've been to Birmingham, Rotherham, and Rochdale and a few others where the 'statistics' belie the actuality of who actually controls the inner cities of Western Europe. Where I live there are three mosques in two square kilometres. Every other shop sells 'curry, pizza, burgers'. Dig beneath the headlines to find the discretly tucked away trials of 'grooming gangs' or Albanian gangsters.
Statistics are not the story. They're the reference points that keeps guilt trippin' libz like your good self, tucked up safe and sound in your Scandinavian flat pack bed every night. I'll put you up bro no problem. I'll give you the grand tour' South of the River' and you can compare it with your 'statistics'. Seriously. All expenses paid.
I enjoy doing meditation with mantras. It relaxes me in good energy. 😴
«12. . .520521522523524525526. . .1,0731,074»
Advertisement