by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .520521522523524525526. . .1,0731,074»

Magnus germania

Yeeeeaaah I feel like both regions are nearing total collapse. Goddamn Vibrants.

Imperial kratos

Brazika wrote:You must be a very moral person, right? I have no problem with warning people about anal sex. As a spiritualist I am, or better saying in your language "someone of morals", I would like to alert people. Because no liberal or anarchist like you mentioned yourself cares about these practices, I believe.

So if you have tips, laws, things that can improve or up our rmb, send me a pm and I will send it to Chanceller.

I am very moral in my belives, perhaps too much, but I was brought up in a Presbyterian family, I was homeschooled, and had very little contact with social media, so yes, I am a little on the too moral side, but I think topics like that should be on a TG chat, but I do agree with you, there are a lot of health problems with that sort of perversion of the natural order that God has given us. Yes, I do know that sounds very bigoted and very Christian, but it is the truth. Also, thanks for the opportunity to put some ideas forward, I will try to do that.

Fashmaster wrote:As I do not participate in anal sex, I cannot notice how "harmful" it is. Perhaps you could elaborate on how exactly it is "harmful"?

I don't know the names of diseases in English, but you just need to have a little logic. You are a very smart guy to understand that this place is for expelling, not introducing. It's our drainpipe. The risks in doing this practice and catching diseases are greater. People can hurt the place and feces can get into the blood, and you know the ending... There are many problems in do it, but as I said I'm just warning. I dont care what people does in private 😁

Imperial kratos wrote:I am very moral in my belives, perhaps too much, but I was brought up in a Presbyterian family, I was homeschooled, and had very little contact with social media, so yes, I am a little on the too moral side, but I think topics like that should be on a TG chat, but I do agree with you, there are a lot of health problems with that sort of perversion of the natural order that God has given us. Yes, I do know that sounds very bigoted and very Christian, but it is the truth. Also, thanks for the opportunity to put some ideas forward, I will try to do that.

Religious need to remove that veil and talk about these issues. There is no problem talking about sex, drinking beers, smoking, etc. Sure, everything is a risk, but what is life without them?

Imperial kratos

Brazika wrote:Religious need to remove that veil and talk about these issues. There is no problem talking about sex, drinking beers, smoking, etc. Sure, everything is a risk, but what is life without them?

Well, part of it is sex is a private affair, and not something that needs to be in movies and TV shows. Second, we do not believe that sex, beer, gambling, and other things are bad, merely that we as sinners abuse the good things God has given us, and distort the relationships around us, such as; infidelity, drunkenness, which leads to violent behavior, spendthrift life, gambling away all income, among other things. This is what I am opposed to, and that is what I think is not worthy to be in our hallowed RMB chat, and I think this should be for higher debates than the prevention of anal sex.

Merther and Brazika

Imperial kratos wrote:Well, part of it is sex is a private affair, and not something that needs to be in movies and TV shows. Second, we do not believe that sex, beer, gambling, and other things are bad, merely that we as sinners abuse the good things God has given us, and distort the relationships around us, such as; infidelity, drunkenness, which leads to violent behavior, spendthrift life, gambling away all income, among other things. This is what I am opposed to, and that is what I think is not worthy to be in our hallowed RMB chat, and I think this should be for higher debates than the prevention of anal sex.

^ this

Imperial kratos

I respect opinion both of you, but as I said I dont see any problem in warn and debate this issue. If you dont feel good debating it dont do it. Who wants debate it you can refute or quote anyway 😁

Imperial kratos

Anarcho-fascists wrote:Lulz. I actually live in London, I know my way around Paris well enough and used to live in Brussels. Maybe I could take you on a night out in one of these cities brah? You can bring your stack of statistics to fend off the 10 %ers. (I'm guessing the other 90 % must be at home posting BLM memes).

So how are we to reverse the downward demographic spiral dude? Up the native birth rate? Install a strong leader? Hungary has managed both of these. They've also managed to close their borders to the stream of mass imigrantion pourng up from Greece and the Balkans on their way to the industrialised conurbations of Western Europe so this curbing the whole mass immigration thing could well be something we may have to vector in.

The EU isn't stable. It's falling apart at the seams. Politically and economically. Militarily it's non existent. How long can the US continue to prop up the EU or its orher far flung 'global markets' when it can't control its own domestic front?

You seem familiar dude. Have you been in FE before?!?

I have not, brother.

At any rate, you have already answered your own question leaving me befuddled as to why you asked it in the first place. In regards to the EU, I was not referring to that deplorable cabal in any way. I spoke of the nations of Europe collectively, true, but not in reference to the so-called "Union". Regardless you should not conflate the situation of an entire nation with your personal, anecdotal experiences. That is quite ignorant.

Brazika wrote:I don't know the names of diseases in English, but you just need to have a little logic. You are a very smart guy to understand that this place is for expelling, not introducing. It's our drainpipe. The risks in doing this practice and catching diseases are greater. People can hurt the place and feces can get into the blood, and you know the ending... There are many problems in do it, but as I said I'm just warning. I dont care what people does in private 😁

Brother you are aware that sexually transmitted diseases can be acquired through any sexual activity involving genitalia, yes? It is not something unique to anal sex. Though yes, anal sex does indeed increase the likelihood of acquiring them. But the existence of the condom renders that fact rather moot, does it not? It does after all decrease the risk of acquiring STDs substantially if not outright eliminating the risk entirely.

Though as you have said, it is a private affair.

Imperial kratos wrote:Well, part of it is sex is a private affair, and not something that needs to be in movies and TV shows. Second, we do not believe that sex, beer, gambling, and other things are bad, merely that we as sinners abuse the good things God has given us, and distort the relationships around us, such as; infidelity, drunkenness, which leads to violent behavior, spendthrift life, gambling away all income, among other things. This is what I am opposed to, and that is what I think is not worthy to be in our hallowed RMB chat, and I think this should be for higher debates than the prevention of anal sex.

Sexual activity is part of basic human being and I will never understand the Conservative Christian mentality of being so ashamed of it. I find Augustinian and Puritan viewpoints to be rather unnatural, frankly.

Imperial kratos

Fashmaster wrote:Sexual activity is part of basic human being and I will never understand the Conservative Christian mentality of being so ashamed of it. I find Augustinian and Puritan viewpoints to be rather unnatural, frankly.

I agree, and that is how God made us, he made man and woman to be together, and he wants us to enjoy pleasures in life. However, in our human nature, we tend to be promiscuous and unfaithful in our relationships, and pervert the order of which we were made. Unfortunately, Augustine, and the later Catholic church pushed in the opposite direction, and said that it was an evil, and to be avoided by those of a higher calling. This too is not what God called us to do, he did not separate Adam from Eve, but he did, in a sense, married them, and put them in a state of relationship. Sexual Immorality is when we stray from our partners, or we have premarital sex, and enter into an "illegal relationship" for lack of a better term, and commit a false commitment. The reason that this hurts God is that marriage is an analogy of our relationship with God, and breaking our fidelity is the same as worshiping idols. Dont get me wrong, sex is a gift from God, and He does not want us to be chaste or never marry, but he wants us to be faithful in the relationships that we enter into.

Fashmaster

Imperial kratos wrote:I agree, and that is how God made us, he made man and woman to be together, and he wants us to enjoy pleasures in life. However, in our human nature, we tend to be promiscuous and unfaithful in our relationships, and pervert the order of which we were made. Unfortunately, Augustine, and the later Catholic church pushed in the opposite direction, and said that it was an evil, and to be avoided by those of a higher calling. This too is not what God called us to do, he did not separate Adam from Eve, but he did, in a sense, married them, and put them in a state of relationship. Sexual Immorality is when we stray from our partners, or we have premarital sex, and enter into an "illegal relationship" for lack of a better term, and commit a false commitment. The reason that this hurts God is that marriage is an analogy of our relationship with God, and breaking our fidelity is the same as worshiping idols. Dont get me wrong, sex is a gift from God, and He does not want us to be chaste or never marry, but he wants us to be faithful in the relationships that we enter into.

Yes, see now this makes sense to me. There is logic and wisdom here. Though I am not an Abrahamist I can agree with this line of thinking. Kudos.

Imperial kratos

What I am wanting say its wrong. The pratic is bad to body. Just that. Fashmaster You being a moral guy and presenting a new faith should be more rational in these matters. 👍🏼

As I already said a guy who advises you to do things that damage the body is unreliable. If you're one of those guys, "Do what you want. There's gotta be law." I'm going to pick on you here with this new "religion". 😁

Post self-deleted by P0rtvgal.

P0rtvgal

To actually be defending anal- hole-ee sh1t!
I'm gonna info dump on that as soon as I find that sht.
Which could take a week or two because it's been a long time since I've seen that one wall of text and links I'm think of right now.

You should stand up for circumcision too dude that'd be super dope bro

Imperial kratos wrote: and I think this should be for higher debates than the prevention of anal sex.


Not prevention, information.

Brazika and Anarcho-fascists

P0rtvgal

Brother, you seem to have some sort of problem with understanding what I am saying. You are attacking arguments I never made; putting words in my mouth. Perhaps I am not explaining it correctly, or perhaps you are simply too stubborn to understand what I am saying? Regardless if you're going to continue doing this then I do not see any reason to continue discussing anything with you. There is no point is discussing anything with someone who either cannot understand - or refuses to understand - what I am saying.

Calm down and clear your head. You're ranting and raving about things that we more or less agree on, yet fail to see this and instead seem to be misinterpreting my arguments to be in favor of something entirely alien and contrary to what I believe. Worst still you are doing it quite condescendingly, which is frankly just insulting and unnecessary.

Imperial kratos

Fashmaster

Brazika wrote:What I am wanting say its wrong. The pratic is bad to body. Just that. Fashmaster You being a moral guy and presenting a new faith should be more rational in these matters. 👍🏼

As I already said a guy who advises you to do things that damage the body is unreliable. If you're one of those guys, "Do what you want. There's gotta be law." I'm going to pick on you here with this new "religion". 😁

I am saying no such thing. You've shifted the goalposts entirely; one minute you're talking about disease, the next the physical body. Which is it? Elaborate. Explain. You are being vague in your arguments.

And frankly your grasp of English needs work because I often find myself struggling to understand what you are saying which can easily result in miscommunication.

Merther

Fashmaster wrote:I am saying no such thing. You've shifted the goalposts entirely; one minute you're talking about disease, the next the physical body. Which is it? Elaborate. Explain. You are being vague in your arguments.

And frankly your grasp of English needs work because I often find myself struggling to understand what you are saying which can easily result in miscommunication.

Seriously did you notice my English mistakes? I think you were the first one in my entire stay here. 👍🏼

As I already told here, you can just not quote me so you don't struggle to understand me, okay?

Brazika wrote:As I already told here, you can just not quote me so you don't struggle to understand me, okay?

And as a reminder, he can also quote you AND tell you he struggles to understand you. No one is exempt from criticism.

Greater-appalachia and Imperial kratos

Merther wrote:And as a reminder, he can also quote you AND tell you he struggles to understand you. No one is exempt from criticism.

That's why I said that. Some people dont accept this and for that reason I ask people doesnt to quote if they don't like the criticism. I'm a bit "liberal" myself on these rmb issues if you didn't notice. As long as I don't insult the other's mother or meaningless fights, I won't touch my swors on anyone.

And if you have a criticism in my posts or my way of being, you can quote without hesitating 😁

Imperial kratos

P0rtvgal wrote:My position is not unsupported by science and no amount of right-think globohomo b*llshit is going to tell me otherwise. I'm a biologist. I've studied Human Biology. I've had these discussions with university professors. They f*cking buckle into semantics. Don't start this b*llshit with me because I don't want to start dumping infographics. It is an observable truth, the differences between the Races of man. Not only that, but I never mentioned superiority or inferiority, so you're moving the goalposts as per usual. I'm talking about differences, many of them measurable, and Im talking about incompatibility. The proof is in the pudding or we wouldn't even be having this discussion.

Your populace hasn't accepted sh*t it's just in a constant state of self censorship and cope with the absolute state of things, and the non-European certainly do NOT see you as an equal or a brother either unless they're high on their american mutt farts and signaling in the name of some higher value looooong lost by your 'people'. The difference between the african and the anglo is far greater than that of the anglo and the german or the italian. This is undeniable. You think they can co-exist? what have you seen? what, you played basketball with some blacks? you went to a baptist church a few times? you made some friends in a middle class school? you got to work with a few of those colorful ethnicities and nothing bad happened? Tremendous! Racism defeated, we can all co-exist and mix, but wait you're not shilling for race mixing and multiracialism or something... somehow.

I'm GLAD the hispanics hate you, the blacks despise you and the asians look down on you, because it's this ridiculous permissive fence sitting non-confrontational sheer lack of self preservation and self hatred that is, truly, by all the laws of life and entropy, worthy of any other group's hate. Only we hate ourselves while the rising masses from elsewhere have no time on their hands to to even think up of such a way to mass suicide their branch of this beautiful tree of Humanity.

Yeah our experiences are different, my country took 900 years to slowly rise and slowly fall whilst yours has nothing but accelerated us into permanent slavery. Your country lost it's chance to be a nation when it signed up to become the golem of internationalism. It's a near still-born. This is the fastest race to the bottom since time immemorial. Groups are made out of the negation of the exterior and the affirmation of the interior, they're different inside and out, of course they'll never see themselves as part of this rot, not unless their truest and goodest sense of collective sense is neutered, castrated, like that of much of the European populace here and in the new world.

"The Roman Empire - glorious as it was; spiritual predecessor to the Romance cultures, of which Portugal is part of - concerned itself only with Romaness."

You mean when they didn't have to stress about mass migrations? No fast travel between lands? The scope of the world as we know it has changed dramatically and that's exactly why Nationalism arose in the late 19th early 20th century as a solid ideology, because it came in a time where mass media began, the post industrial age brought us all sorts of new problems, many of which, were always there, simply not in the same scope. To want to LARP as an idealistic romanite shows a LOT of wishful thinking about Roman affairs and a LOT of turning a blind eye to the different ages that Empire went through and what ultimately led to it's demise. "All Romanized" my ass nigguh.

*wipes away tear*

That was beautiful homes. These barbarians are lucky you let them bask in your glory.

P0rtvgal, T-rex, Greater-appalachia, and Imperial kratos

Fashmaster wrote:

At any rate, you have already answered your own question leaving me befuddled as to why you asked it in the first place. In regards to the EU, I was not referring to that deplorable cabal in any way. I spoke of the nations of Europe collectively, true, but not in reference to the so-called "Union". Regardless you should not conflate the situation of an entire nation with your personal, anecdotal experiences. That is quite ignorant.

You're right. It is ignorant of me. In future I'll stick to State sponsored 'statistics' and the BBC and The Guardian to formulate my opinions rather than rely on my personal anecdotal experience and of these around me. What was I thinking?

Have you had friends who've been to FE before dude? You're line of thinking seems familiar.

Greater-appalachia

Anarcho-fascists wrote:You're right. It is ignorant of me. In future I'll stick to State sponsored 'statistics' and the BBC and The Guardian to formulate my opinions rather than rely on my personal anecdotal experience and of these around me. What was I thinking?

Have you had friends who've been to FE before dude? You're line of thinking seems familiar.

My "line of thinking"? You mean reason? I would hope that reason was common enough in the world that you'd have encountered it before.

Brother, the city of London has a population of almost 9,000,000. The United Kingdom as a whole has a population of almost 68,000,000. That is not even a quarter of the total population of the entire country. Applying your own experiences in London to the nation as a whole is simply... stupid. There is no more polite way of putting it, it is simply stupid to conflate the situation in a single city - one, single city - to that of the entire country. Have you even ever been outside London? Anywhere else? York? Manchester? Oxford? Edinburgh? Cardiff? Belfast? Cornwall? The Isle of Mann? Literally anywhere else in the country? Can you honestly tell me that - if you have - that it was the exact same everywhere else just as it was in London?

You cannot, because that is not possible. New York City has a composition of just 44% Whites (including European immigrants), total. That means 56% of the city's population is non-White, including Latinos, Blacks, Asians, Indians, and so on. If we are to apply that statistic nation-wide - as you have done for London and the UK - it would suggest that the USA is comprised mostly of non-Whites, and that Whites are in fact the minority. But this is not the case. The White American population stands in an overwhelming majority at 73.1% According to your "logic" we should disregard the statistics because they don't conform to your worldview.

Very well then. You say the statistics are wrong? Prove it. Where is your evidence? Present it and prove me wrong. Prove that the statistics are being manipulated. Surely if you are so certain that these statistics are wrong then you must have proof beyond "Well, I live in London and there are a lot of non-Whites here therefor it must be the same all over the country"?

Imperial kratos

Fashmaster wrote:My "line of thinking"? You mean reason? I would hope that reason was common enough in the world that you'd have encountered it before.

Brother, the city of London has a population of almost 9,000,000. The United Kingdom as a whole has a population of almost 68,000,000. That is not even a quarter of the total population of the entire country. Applying your own experiences in London to the nation as a whole is simply... stupid. There is no more polite way of putting it, it is simply stupid to conflate the situation in a single city - one, single city - to that of the entire country. Have you even ever been outside London? Anywhere else? York? Manchester? Oxford? Edinburgh? Cardiff? Belfast? Cornwall? The Isle of Mann? Literally anywhere else in the country? Can you honestly tell me that - if you have - that it was the exact same everywhere else just as it was in London?

You cannot, because that is not possible. New York City has a composition of just 44% Whites (including European immigrants), total. That means 56% of the city's population is non-White, including Latinos, Blacks, Asians, Indians, and so on. If we are to apply that statistic nation-wide - as you have done for London and the UK - it would suggest that the USA is comprised mostly of non-Whites, and that Whites are in fact the minority. But this is not the case. The White American population stands in an overwhelming majority at 73.1% According to your "logic" we should disregard the statistics because they don't conform to your worldview.

Very well then. You say the statistics are wrong? Prove it. Where is your evidence? Present it and prove me wrong. Prove that the statistics are being manipulated. Surely if you are so certain that these statistics are wrong then you must have proof beyond "Well, I live in London and there are a lot of non-Whites here therefor it must be the same all over the country"?

Referring you back to my original post, I Ireferenced London, Paris and Brussels but yeah I've been to Birmingham, Rotherham, and Rochdale and a few others where the 'statistics' belie the actuality of who actually controls the inner cities of Western Europe. Where I live there are three mosques in two square kilometres. Every other shop sells 'curry, pizza, burgers'. Dig beneath the headlines to find the discretly tucked away trials of 'grooming gangs' or Albanian gangsters.

Statistics are not the story. They're the reference points that keeps guilt trippin' libz like your good self, tucked up safe and sound in your Scandinavian flat pack bed every night. I'll put you up bro no problem. I'll give you the grand tour' South of the River' and you can compare it with your 'statistics'. Seriously. All expenses paid.

P0rtvgal

Magnus germania

Unrelated, but is there anyone else here that either has a good grasp of English or doesn't talk like a cultist besides the two I've seen? Genuine question.

P0rtvgal, Chalybea, and Brazika

Magnus germania wrote:Unrelated, but is there anyone else here that either has a good grasp of English or doesn't talk like a cultist besides the two I've seen? Genuine question.

Hello Magnus. Good to see you I thought you hadn't followed us after the end of the IFF. I think my English is rather good; need help with anything ? Atsuria might help you too.

Magnus germania

I enjoy doing meditation with mantras. It relaxes me in good energy. 😴

«12. . .520521522523524525526. . .1,0731,074»

Advertisement