by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .21,79121,79221,79321,79421,79521,79621,797. . .44,43144,432»

Bucre wrote:Stop calling me him

I'm not calling you 'him'. I'm calling you you.

Bucre wrote:They are just dumb

Great response.

Kathol Rift wrote:Okay, anyone want to cool down and ignore the annoyance, and instead have an intellectual discussion about battle strategy with me?

I'd love to.

Post by Bucre suppressed by a moderator.

Kathol Rift wrote:Okay, anyone want to cool down and ignore the annoyance, and instead have an intellectual discussion about battle strategy with me?

Of course. The one and only strategy is the mass assault along with short attack

Bunnies, Salsacia, and Ancapstands

Poland lithuanian ruthenia ukraine wrote:Who is he?

Serial troller who's like the proverbial clingy ex-boyfriend who can't take a hint.

Post by Bucre suppressed by a moderator.

Ancapstands

Strala wrote:Of course. The one and only strategy is the mass assault along with short attack

Superior firepower gang

Strala wrote:Of course. The one and only strategy is the mass assault along with short attack

And a non-stop artillery barrage while infantry charges with bayonets

Bucre wrote:I'm not him ok,you can go on and on

And you have erased all my doubts about it.
The way you write your posts; the fact that you forgot your previous nation's password, just like Alirano did once; the way you argue, and the lengths of your arguments; and last but not least, you don't seem to know about ideologies as you have proven with Libertarians now, just like the last attempt with communism yesterday.

If you say so.

Post by Bucre suppressed by a moderator.

Bucre wrote:Yes

You were the annoyance I was referencing, but if you have a view on battle strategy, share please.

Wubdich wrote:I'm not calling you 'him'. I'm calling you you.

Great response.

I'd love to.

Cool.

Strala wrote:Of course. The one and only strategy is the mass assault along with short attack

I disagree. Mass assault can be easily defeated in 2 ways. 1, the obvious choice of setting a heavily defended line, and mowing them down. That only works if you have the resources to sustain that though. Option 2, simply don’t give them anything to attack. Avoid them. Harass them. Guerrilla them. You can’t mass attack something that isn’t letting itself be attacked.

Ancapstands wrote:Superior firepower gang

I use Crusaders, Shermans and Panzer IIs. Does that count?

Ancapstands

Bucre wrote:---

(Eyebrow raise)

Bucre wrote:-sniiiiiip-

Swearing is still a big nono

Post by Bucre suppressed by a moderator.

Poland lithuanian ruthenia ukraine

Mestovakia wrote:Serial troller who's like the proverbial clingy ex-boyfriend who can't take a hint.

I don't understand, but I'm assuming bad

Bucre wrote:Dude member bucreu a few hours ago? I'm him ok

Yeah. And?

If you say so.

Bucre wrote:Dude member bucreu a few hours ago? I'm him ok

Begone

Post by Bucre suppressed by a moderator.

Mestovakia wrote:I use Crusaders, Shermans and Panzer IIs. Does that count?

Thats more Mobile warfare doctrine.

Ancapstands wrote:Thats more Mobile warfare doctrine.

I'd use Tigers but they don't show up in the desert levels.

Ancapstands wrote:Superior firepower gang

Ancapstands wrote:Thats more Mobile warfare doctrine.

HoI 4 doctrines do not qualify as actual doctrines.

Post by Bucre suppressed by a moderator.

Poland lithuanian ruthenia ukraine

Wubdich wrote:HoI 4 doctrines do not qualify as actual doctrines.

yeah, use Defeat in detail

Bucre wrote:Pay rebels invade them invade rebels done.

Wrong, very wrong in most cases. Let me break that strategy down into its components and then disprove it.

A. “Pay rebels.” This assumes that there is already a group of people existing in the other country that is large enough and willing enough to pull off an effective rebellion, which in many countries, there isn’t. And, you need to get money and supplies to them without getting noticed, or else this whole part of the plan is pointless because they’ll just block it.

B. “Invade them.” Why not start with this part? Seems pretty straightforward and generic and vague.

C. “Invade rebels.” Well, now this plan will only work once if it works at all, because now no other rebels will trust you again, because you just betrayed the people you set up.

And now it’s dinner time. Adios.

«12. . .21,79121,79221,79321,79421,79521,79621,797. . .44,43144,432»

Advertisement