by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Ad From Max

Providence: The new novel by Max Barry, creator of NationStates

Alliance of Conservative States RMB

WA Delegate: None.

Founder: The Nuclear Strike Force of Vaudois

Last WA Update:

Board Activity History Admin Rank

Largest Cheese Export Sector: 1,134th Largest Furniture Restoration Industry: 2,091st Highest Disposable Incomes: 2,235th
World Factbook Entry

This region is a protectorate of the Republic of Conservative Nations. Join today!


Embassies: Confederacy of Conservative Countries, The Conservative Army, Federation of Conservative Nations, Anti LeftWing Alliance, Dixieland, The Conservative army of the Confederacy, Socialists for a New World, The Soviet Union of Democratic America, Drilling Ground, Union of Socialist Eurasia, Land of Marxism, MAGA, and Republic of Conservative Nations.

Tags: Anti-Communist, Anti-Fascist, Capitalist, Conservative, Human-Only, Libertarian, Minuscule, and Password.

Alliance of Conservative States is home to a single nation.

Today's World Census Report

The Highest Average Incomes in Alliance of Conservative States

The World Census carefully compared the average spending power of citizens in each nation.

As a region, Alliance of Conservative States is ranked 6,382nd in the world for Highest Average Incomes.

NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Nuclear Republic of Conservative States OfficerConservative Democracy“For Liberty!”

Regional Happenings

More...

Alliance of Conservative States Regional Message Board

I am for reasonable property rights to help the environment and states be responsible for poultion. I am for conservation agencyís bringing wildlife back to how it was. Tolkien conservative

under reasonable laws If a government could it should protect the family unit from being destroyed When families are strong all are strong society and grades are strong and happy! I am for taxpayer-paid circumcision because I support this for medical and religious reasons. parents are performing the operation on their children for religious/ health reasons, prohibiting them from doing so could theoretically be an infringement upon their rights to practice their religion as they see fit.

social Conservatism is only is good if the government policies work to protect the family unit from being destroyed.I don't think people are going to find such pro morality laws appealing anymore even if they could or did protect the family from being destroyed health laws are often moral laws such as 🚭 no porn, street drug ban, or No prostitution, more laws to prevent STDs.

Family values are dead in America and so is social conservative values. Because social conservatism is dead without a chance of revival the government should try to leave people alone as much as possible. WE MUST STOP GOVERNMENT SHOVING DOWN it's Socially liberal political- culture ideology and corrupted morals on our society and people from SJW I am against H.R. 1913, a proposed hate crime bill that would add to the federal hate crime statute the categories of sexual orientation, gender identity and disability. The reason Why I am against this law, because it violates equal justice under the law by creating different classes of victims for the same crime.
I support A free French heritage Quebec With no Justin Trudeau! I support Canadian separation movements Many people say Iím an idealist, but I prefer pragmatism over idealism [i]I can focus on what needs to get done first
Im
not politically correct, but I try not to be offensive like Donald Trump who canít work with people [/b]he will say anything that is on his mind
Let faith influence your politics instead of politics influencing your faith We shouldnít combine organized religion into politics or Form theological/political parties like the Pharisees and Sadducees.
Most importantly No such word is ever called separation between church and state ever existed in the united states constitution

Above all else I support workers getting their Holy day off Sunday for Christians, Saturday for Jews and everyone else Freedom Of religion.
Our founding fathers wanted Government out of Religion, not religion out of government and tended to respect the Judeo Christian values. But if Congress wishes to avoid any reference to a specific religion while still mentioning God then a clear separation between church and state exist. I am ok with the Judeo Christian values on government buildings particularly state and local governments as long if they are donated by the People. I prefer the Torah, Psalms particularly as a compromise with Jews, Muslims, and born again Christians.
most importantly during the constitutional convention era, all most all schools were not controlled by any government rather privately run. throughout most of America's history, public schools were controlled by local and state governments. So teaching from the bible would not violate the federal constitution. in fact, some states had churches sponsored by the governments after the constitution. Furthermore, readings in scripture could be apart of literature such as the mythology epics are taught in public schools
on the principle of separation between church ⛪ and state
I say bring the government out of marriage and give it back to religious institutions. I say have civil unions or economic spousal packs for optional Government benefits, tax deduction, eligibilityís, and curses That way marriages can no longer be a political issue rather a moral Spiritual individual Choice.
I do not support the government changing the definition of marriage.
However, I am for all marriages being a private non-authoritative governmental institution
I like Dr. Ron Paulís ideas about choosing your own insurance, doctors, hospitals. We need Free markets not cronyism from corporatism. We need the cost of healthcare to go down and efficiency to rise not everyoneís taxes from a single-payer health care system that would bankrupt America.
[The war of drugs should be about healing people instead of arresting drug users. But we should never encourage drug .usageRest in Peace Herbert Walker Bush America misses you
When it comes to international affairs I believe that such decisions should not be based on partisan political beliefs, but it has to go through Congress. Intervention or nonintervention should be decided on the wisdom of our military, international, advisory groups who will ask the congress over intervention I am 100% a war hawk in wars against people who have declared war and attacked America

If Congress goes to war then congress must declare war
Of course.if the vets are not in favor or the debt then maybe it is not a good idea to invade.
Ron Paul received 71% Of the military's votes 🗳 during the 2012 primary I like Ron Paul he is honest, committed and a great communicator rand Paul is a less cooler yet younger more pragmatic version of him
I am against 100% against Obamaís ideology As for Ben Shapiro Is a very brilliant and intellectual man
The government should raise taxes to keep a balanced budget . I favor progressive estate taxes and income tax .cooperations taxes should be so income taxes can generate more revenue



Im far more than a balanced budget, I am strongly 100% for America making payments to pay off great portions of the national debt and greatly lowering spending 1 keep on Raising the age limit is for Social Security. Possibly cut military spending, 2 cut all pensions both current and future that means social security, unemployment benefits, income security's, Medicare/Medicaid turn over Medicare or Medicaid for the states responsibility Also destroy cooperate welfare, abolish Government subsidies except for farmers, Cut all federal spending, I support a constitutional amendment allowing a line item Veto. This could curb all future spending bills
WHAT CONSUMERS WILL SEE about a large national debt
Here is how the national l debt is affecting Americans today.
1Rising Interest rates
The higher the consumer debt and interest rates on credit cards and loans, the more foreign investments the country receives. This is bad for you, but good for the federal government.
2 Weak job market
High national debt means little economic growth. Unfortunately, this also means fewer jobs are created through government spending on projects like road construction and small business loans.
3 Higher Taxes
When the government can't make revenue through typical means to pay off the debt, it will turn to raise taxes for consumers and property owners.
2029.
Interest costs are growing rapidly.
Interest costs are projected to climb from $383 billion in 2019 to $928 billion by 2029. Over the next decade, interest will total nearly $7 trillion. We will soon be spending more on net interest costs than we do in other essential areas such as Medicaid and Defense.
Key investments in our future are at a risk.

Higher interest costs could crowd out important public investments that can fuel economic growth ó priority areas like education, R&D, and infrastructure. In addition, growing federal debt reduces the amount of private capital for investments, which hurts economic growth and wages. A nation saddled with debt will have less to invest in its own future.
Rising debt means lower incomes. Government shutdowns hurt the economy

Based on CBO projections from last year, growing debt would reduce the income of a 4-person family, on average, by $16,000 in 30 years. Stagnating wages and growing disparities in income and wealth are very concerning trends. The federal government should not allow budget imbalances to harm American citizens.
Less flexibility to respond to crises.

On our current path, we are at greater risk of a fiscal crisis, and high amounts of debt leave policymakers with much less flexibility to deal with unexpected events. If we face another major recession like that of 2007Ė2009, it will be more difficult to work our way out.
Protecting the essential safety net.

A solid fiscal outlook provides a foundation for a growing, thriving economy. Putting our nation on a sustainable fiscal path creates a positive environment for growth, opportunity, and prosperity. With a strong fiscal foundation, the nation will have increased access to capital, more resources for private and public investments, improved consumer and business confidence, and a stronger safety net

Too keep a strong economy Iím for fracking
Cheaper gas prices. ...
It produces economic growth. ...
Natural gas is one of the cleanest energy sources of energy and helps America reduce CO2 emissions. ...
Many products are made from oil & natural gas, from computers to shampoo!
6. It promotes energy independence 7. Fracking supports jobs.8. Unlike wind or solar, you donít have to depend on the weather for fracking.9 Provides funding for hospitals and other public services like schools

Us should expand offshore oil to keep the economy strong which more revnue could be used for fiscal conservatism and cheaper gas prices for your car.

10 reasons why coal is a good energy source:
The cheapest source of energy. It is by far cheaper than nuclear, natural gas, oil. Hydro usually will be slightly cheaper. However, problems with hydro include no new facilities because of public outcry when river valleys are dammed; and, peak demand time problems (rivers running dry in the dead of summer when peak air conditioning is needed and rivers are frozen in the dead of winter when peak heating is needed).

Coal also provides a stable source of energy (no Arab oil embargoes, no sudden scarcity like your experience with natural gas) and there is a very plentiful supply both in the U.S. and in other foreign countries.

Coal is nothing more than ancient wood which has been under pressure for millions of years. It is not sinister as you may have been led to believe.

Coal provides many jobs. Unlike other forms of energy (nuclear, natural gas, oil, hydroelectric), coal provides many jobs in removing coal from the earth, transporting it to the utility, burning it, and properly disposing of coal ash.

Coal is American made. We do not have to import this product into this country.

Coal can be mined and burned with little environmental impact. There has been tremendous strides in environmental responsibility with mining coal and burning coal. However, there still is pressure of global warming. If we burn less fossil fuels, what, as a practical matter, is our energy alternative? Nuclear? Hydro? Solar (there is no practical way to provide the massive amounts of electricity needed to run our country through solar energy---it is viewed as impractical at this time)?

Coal mining reclamation can give the surface landowner many more options for developing his land. In the mountainous terrain, a mining process call mountaintop removal can create very valuable and useable level land for the surface owner. The surface owner not only gets his land developed, he usually is paid 50 cents a ton for the inconvenience of the use of his surface. Surface mining cannot occur without the specific consent of the surface owner. If the surface owner is lucky enough to own the coal rights, he's looking at another $2.00 a ton for royalty payments. In 1977 the federal Surface Mining Law was passed that required coal operators to reclaim the land in an equal, if not better, condition that existed prior to mining. We're doing an excellent job with our reclamation efforts. I would suggest that you go to http://www.osmre.gov/. This is the web site of the federal agency that oversees coal mining from an environmental standpoint.

The prudent us of coal will allow the U. S. the time needed to develop viable alternative energy sources---primarily solar technology and fuel from grain---without any negative impact on our national economy.

Coal provides 56% of the electricity used in the nation each day. It provides 95% of Kentucky's electricity. Electrical rates in Kentucky are the second lowest in the nation---because of coal.
[i]West Virginiaís entire economy is biased on coal
penslavania and a good many other states would be severely hurt
Coal is good for Kentucky's economy. The Kentucky coal industry brought $3.1 billion into Kentucky from out-of-state during Fiscal Year 1996-97 through coal sales to customers in 29 other states and 15 foreign countries. In Kentucky, it paid over $800 million in direct wages, directly employing over 19,000 persons and indirectly providing an additional 60,000 jobs. In addition to all the normal business taxes, the coal industry in Kentucky paid an additional $160 million in severance taxes to the state

Sanders ideas and the progressive democrats would bankrupt and destroy America
Bernie Sanders or the Democrat's solution isnít the right one to solve the student loan debt or any problem in America. I favor Marco RubioĎs plans of reducing college debt . is long if we donít take from public education Iím for Vouchers
Iím strongly for chartering effective private education so all not just the rich will be Abel to attend a private school or be homeschooled this would also have the government be less reliant on the Monopoly of public education.
A New American Century! I supported Marco Rubio for president during the primary[/u]
I voted for Gary Johnson because he was better qualified for president. Bring the election to the Congress for someone liberals and conservatives could settle by making sure both donít have a plurality of 270 electorals . such as moderate John Kasich Governor of Ohio and a workable Vice President .

I am strongly for globalism, and commercial rights
I hate tariffs
I personally canít stand Donald trump
I support Free trade to countries that donít oppress their people embargo on China,Cuba 🇨🇳,

Above all else Iím pro-immigrant Iam against trumps wall and border security should be handled at the state level if we are not going to have open LAND borders. Is long if there isnít racial profiling to Latinos

We should accept refugees escaping from oppressive dictators, civil war, and from poverty screen them out America was built on immigration.
if a Moralist Muslim can respect woman and truly love his wife then I would not consider him or their people bad. As for Africa, we stopped the slave trade so we shouldnít accept immigrants from the continent of Africa.

I support a Canadian American Union to all those who favor a compromise that would benefit both nations I favor open land borders instead of a welfare state in a heartbeat!
I Am For open land borders because of freedom,tradition,economic growth Immgration not only befits the immigrants Who only wish to feed their family ís. It helps the American economy from people not willing to work and saves social security from being bankrupt Interesting fact People from Central America and Mexico especially the Mexican Americans intend to have a fair deal of Native American Indian blood in their ancestry. As a society we should at least look back at horrific atrocities and injustices, we did to Native-born Americans. Im not a social justice warrior however Since Latinos at tend to have at mixed Native American ancestry we should let them in since they are Native to the American continents our founding fathers called for civilizing our Native American brethren I support in Build up nations in destitute, dire poverty so they become developed
The state governments, Madison argues, are closer to the people and can focus on the welfare of the people, regulating ordinary affairs such as the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, as well as the internal order of each state, and should have numerous undefined powers to do so, while the national government, being bigger and possessing national resources, can bring victory in war, protect the people's liberty, and maintain peace between the states, and should have clear, few, defined powers to do so, mostly focusing on external objects such as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce and national taxation. He suggests that in times of peace, the state governments will tend to be larger and more powerful, while in times of crisis and war, the national government will expand as needed. Such a federal system will bring the government as a whole closer to the people than a purely national form of government would.
I favor us return to the practice of sending our state legislators to the senate as ambassadors of the state yet they are democratically elected by the people .possibly through A rank system or if the candidate fails the popular vote
I am enthusiastically, devoted in state rights,limited government and decentralization I believe that social welfare programs are the choices of state and local governments NOT BIG GOVERNMENTstates should have more responsibility's not the federal government Devolution Iím a 100% for Local governments.
on a state and local level Iím for reasonable social welfare programs, that can lift people out of poverty and Iím for charity
Regardless Of my belief in compulsory Vaccinations, it should be decided at the state level.
States should possibly sponsor marriage counseling programs and courtship preparations if they find it necessary to decrease divorce rates and lower people on child life support and prefer perhaps higher grades with a stable marriage .The
States, not the federal government should be responsible for providing the general welfare there for states should be responsible in deciding Where these wards of the state go.

I am against a blank check to partners who are not a mom and dad who want to adopt.

I believe a mother and father family structure is best for the Welfare for these adopted children who deserve a Loving decent mother and father. Statistics generally support this belief

. It goes without saying
adoption agencies should prioritize offering children to straight couples before Ever even considering offering to same sex couples

as long as they pass the same background checks and pass on paper as straight couples

States should be given the choice should same sex pairs be allowed to adopt

Birth parents should always have the right to refuse their child being brainwashed into the political/culture LGBT adoption catering agencies.

Above all else on this topic we should not tolerate the Biased LGBT Adoption catering agencies who produce biased and unreliable statistics

2 males simply canít do the same functions of parenting that a mother comes along with.
But likely if we prefer safety standards over political catering to the L.G.B.T community pushed by Leftists Culture then we should care more about the safety of the children instead of political catering To the LGBT Agenda Adoption Has never been a right to anyone, but a privilege. so overall I do disprove of same-sex adopting but instead of being accused of being homophobic I support adoption agencies go over rigid safety standards that already would have a sufficient number of same-sex parents and above all else transgender who cant adopt to do to safety measures. At the end of the day, homosexuals wishing to adopt would be hurt more than helped under true safety standards, not over discrimination but over parenting statistics, they donít have a mom and dad to take care of the children
Look if you are An L.G.B.Q do whatever you want is long if you are not affecting anyone. You may certainly have children through natural means though.
I am for banning gay conversion therapy because it teaches self-hatred, pseudoscience and is a scam!

But if there was such a place that would humanly help homosexual people expand their sexual horizons to herto sexual desires or attractiveness to the opposite sex then it wouldnít be bad. Homosexual male gene I canít deny it. But with women that certainly isnít the case
. But homosexual men have married a straight woman before and Stayed happy and loyal to the marriage before
Judaical activism when the supreme courts forces their political opinion on others disregarding the constituting and uses the court to legislate the laws Lawrence v. Texas (2003) 👎🏼overturning all Sodemny laws, Obergefell v. Hodges forced all states to have Government same sex marriage👎🏼,Hollingsworth v. Perry Ė 2013 decision by federal judge Vaughn R. Walker overturning California's constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage👎🏼.Roe v. Wade - 1973 Supreme Court ruling creating the constitutional right to Abortion 👎🏼

We have the constitution for a reason and the Supreme Court is supposed to interpret the laws not make them United States Supreme Court decisions
On May 22, 1967, the Supreme Court upheld the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which among other things banned homosexuals, as constitutional 👍🏼
Bowers v. Hardwick States a ruling
Constitution provides no protection for those wishing to engage in ďsodomy. 👍🏼However as a compromise I support a federal law allowing private homosexual activity between consenting adults if they promise not to tread on anyone ,but themselves
Liberty over security Im strongly for the Second Amendment,background checks and closing the gun show loophole as a compromise and supporting gun ownership. The people have the right to form a Militia I Prefer John Lock
Confederate farmersI support some private labor unions, but Iím strongly against public sector unions [IMG]
I agree closer to the libertarian party more then I lean to Republicans I agree with the libertarians around 58 percent typically 56%republican

I would have been a moderate populist in u.s history in the 1890s I support Low tariffs, free trade, free coinage of silver, income tax and no monopolies, pro farmers legislations,

Reforms to help all people particularly the farmers

classical Liberal in many respects with a personality of social conservatism, but according to i side with Quiz Iím a libertarian in American politics Im not in favor of murder called assisted suicide euthanasia
1. Human offspring are human beings, persons from conception, whether that takes place as natural or artificial fertilization, by cloning, or by any other means.

2. Abortion is homicide -- the killing of one person by another.

3. One's right to control one's own body does not allow violating the obligation not to aggress. There is never a right to kill an innocent person. Prenatally, we are all innocent persons.

4. A prenatal child has the right to be in the mother's body. Parents have no right to evict their children from the crib or from the womb and let them die. Instead both parents, the father as well as the mother, owe them support and protection from harm.

5. No government, nor any individual, has a just power to legally "de-person" any one of us, born or preborn.
6. The proper purpose of the law is to side with the innocent, not against them.
[/u]Abortion Isn't A religious or theological debate itís a secular humanitarian right to live regardless of sex,race color or creedb] abortion should be banned after the third trimester as a national law. The states should take care of further bans and always prevent abortions 2009, I am against cH.R. 1913, a proposed hate crime bill that would add to the federal hate crime statute the categories of sexual orientation, gender identity and disability. The reason because it violates equal justice under the law by creating different classes of victims for the same crime.
the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

I actually believe a government should try to leave people alone the ďnon-aggression principle to Individuals of the land of liberty 🗽.since society tends to change let government remain neutral to it particularly in a very diverse nation with very different views and beliefs.
the pragmatist in politics. But Jeffersonian/Jacksonian 19th. century state rights, Strict constructionism, Limited Government, sound good money, low spending, little or no debt, low taxes, low tariffs, and Expansion! [i] [i]Jefferson and Liberty too!
1825
Preceded by
Anti-Administration party
Succeeded by
Democratic Party (Jacksonians)
Ideology
Classical liberalism
Agrarianism
Anti-Federalism
Jeffersonianism
populism
Republicanism
Thomas Jefferson adopted many of the ideals of liberalism, but in the Declaration of Independence changed Locke's "life, liberty and property" to the more socially liberal "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness".[4] As the United States grew, the industry became a larger and larger part of American life; and during the term of its first populist President, Andrew Jackson, economic questions came to the forefront. The economic ideas of the Jacksonian era were almost universally the ideas of classical liberalism. Freedom was maximized when the government took a "hands-off" attitude toward the economy.

Jacksonian Democrats I would have been a true hardcore Jacksonian Democrat
-supported Manifest Destiny and expansion
-opposed a national bank based on its history of cronyism and corruption in the First and Second Bank of the US
-low tariff for free trade
-restriction of the use of paper currency
-preferred church schools over the public, which they thought interfered with religious liberty and parental rights
-Catholic Irish and German immigrants tended to be Democrat
-strongest on the frontier and with subsistence farming areas
-supported limited central government, like Jefferson
-wanted more farms to raise families in the traditional style

general, Locofocos supported Andrew Jackson and Van Buren, and were for free trade, greater circulation of specie, legal protections for labor unions and against paper money, financial speculation, and state banks.
Ralph Waldo Emerson said of the Locofocos: "The new race is stiff, heady, and rebellious; they are fanatics in freedom; they hate tolls, taxes, turnpikes, banks, hierarchies, governors, yea, almost all laws."

l Copperhead Democrats
Historical leaders
Clement Vallandigham
Alexander Long
Founded
1860
Dissolved
1868
Ideology
State rights
Anti-Civil War
Jacksonianism
Traditionalism
[ I donít support a draft for anyone who is forced to fight in a domestic war against Americans! I usually donít like forcing people to do things they donít wish to do in government.
yes the Dixie dragon 🐉 must be crushed,but only constitution and democracy stand in our way!(sarcasm)Lincoln himself was certainly honest,but he dangerously violated the constitutional libertyís Empire and tyrant is kinda an exaggeration, yet they wish to not be under his rule which he is forcing. I would have advised Lincoln to do what his top general Winfield Scott believed. He proposed to surrender the southerner forts as a gesture of goodwill to the south. Lincoln actually believed in gradual emancipation to the African slaves and proposed their new home would be Liberia 🇱🇷. Leave The Confederacy of Independent systems Alone!

I Honestly prefer the anti-federalist. Although the constitution is a very unique document [i] I prefer a much more limited role in government with greater participation of the common man in democracy.Expand DemocracyI want there to be far more localized democratic Voting

The constitution has plenty of elitist aspects, but it is very stabel
I like the British U.K Independence Party.
European immigration is not the same as American immigration.
I prefer the Canadian libertarian party in Canada
I prefer republican government instead of a monarchy
in the avavenger'sivil war I side with Captian America because I think The Avengers should not be subjected to a world governing body. The Avengers should be an independent authority. I prefer captain team more anyhow
. The League of Nations meant well and so does The United Nations The current system is weak, ineffective, powerless, and at anything prolongs Wars then solves them. If we are going to be subjected to a world government body then we need to put more reforms in a currently failed system. I believe in no war crimes and humanitarian mercy though. Malice to none and charity for all!

Read factbook

BROTHERS OF THE FEDERATION! Lend me your ear for a few moments.

Since early 2017, a staunch force of conservatism has existed in our corner of NationStates. Our little band began in the Confederation of Conservative Nations, then moved upward to the Confederacy of Conservative Nations, and after tragedy created the Federation of Conservative Nations. As you are likely aware, a series of unfortunate events have led to the legal transfer of authority and government to a new era in the Republic of Conservative Nations.

Our regional family has always stood up for Conservatism, no matter which name we called ourselves by at the time. When the Leftists in the World Assembly have ground their thumb down on national sovereignty, we have always risen up in defiance. We have stood for right and truth and the principles by which we live and for which we exist.

The FCN is, sadly, now an empty shell, a memorial to what once was. The future in the RCN, however, is bright, and the core of the FCN is taking the RCN to new heights. The mistakes of the past will hopefully become lessons that will inform our growth and be learned from without repeating them.

There is a force, however, that seeks to diminish and demean the glory and legacy of the FCN. The so-called League of Conservative Nations has taken hold of our beloved home, trashing the RMB and tarnishing the memory of the FCN. I call on you to reject their overlordship.

The CCN/CCN≤/FCN always stood with our Pro-Life allies, and defended the sacred and absolute right to life by fighting in the halls of the World Assembly on this issue. Right To Life has not been the only region to lead on this fight. One of our Delegates authored a resolution to repeal the pro-abortion laws on the books. We have proudly stood with RTL and conservative values, and always will.

Recently, the RCN assisted RTL in a pro-life mission. We reached out to friends and individual nations across NationStates, endeavoring to recruit additional support to accomplish our mission goals. When the LCN heard that we had contacted individuals within their region with the pro-life plea, they immediately ordered their citizens to cease and desist from even allowing such invitations to be heard.

Additionally, they came to the FCN RMB, a RMB of a region that has helped lead the pro-life effort on NationStates, espousing beliefs that are antithetical to a pro-life ethic and lying about the FCN and the character of FCN/RCN members.

Despite their name, the LCN is not conservative. They can not be relied on to fight for conservatism. They will not fight for conservatism.

In the finale of C.S. Lewis' The Chronicles of Narnia, there was a climatic battle between the true Narnians, quislings collaborating with a foreign foe, and Narnian dwarfs. While the Narnian king and his supporters were engaged in a losing fight with the Calormene foes, the dwarfs sat idly by, refusing to lift a finger in assistance. "The dwarfs are for the dwarfs!" they cried, launching periodic attacks into both Narnians and Calormenes. In the end, their refusal to assist those who were their most natural allies ended in their own destruction, as well as the end of Narnian rule.

This is what the LCN has become. Whatever they once might have been, they are no longer friends to the conservative cause.

In the words of Saint Paul, "Come out from among them, and be ye separate". Reject the LCN. Come carry on the legacy and heritage of the FCN by moving to and taking part in the RCN. Take up the banner of Conservatism and help us take up the noble fight.

Brothers! Lend us your might! The Republic of Conservative Nations will welcome you with open arms! Together we can carry on the legacy of the Federation of Conservative Nations and move forward with steadfast resolve, dedicating ourselves to advancing conservatism and defending life and liberty. Join us, and reject those who would tarnish the memory of what the FCN once was!

New Waldensia
Former President, Delegate, etcetera, of the FCN
Current Chancellor of the RCN

New Waldensia wrote:BROTHERS OF THE FEDERATION! Lend me your ear for a few moments.

Since early 2017, a staunch force of conservatism has existed in our corner of NationStates. Our little band began in the Confederation of Conservative Nations, then moved upward to the Confederacy of Conservative Nations, and after tragedy created the Federation of Conservative Nations. As you are likely aware, a series of unfortunate events have led to the legal transfer of authority and government to a new era in the Republic of Conservative Nations.

Our regional family has always stood up for Conservatism, no matter which name we called ourselves by at the time. When the Leftists in the World Assembly have ground their thumb down on national sovereignty, we have always risen up in defiance. We have stood for right and truth and the principles by which we live and for which we exist.

The FCN is, sadly, now an empty shell, a memorial to what once was. The future in the RCN, however, is bright, and the core of the FCN is taking the RCN to new heights. The mistakes of the past will hopefully become lessons that will inform our growth and be learned from without repeating them.

There is a force, however, that seeks to diminish and demean the glory and legacy of the FCN. The so-called League of Conservative Nations has taken hold of our beloved home, trashing the RMB and tarnishing the memory of the FCN. I call on you to reject their overlordship.

The CCN/CCN≤/FCN always stood with our Pro-Life allies, and defended the sacred and absolute right to life by fighting in the halls of the World Assembly on this issue. Right To Life has not been the only region to lead on this fight. One of our Delegates authored a resolution to repeal the pro-abortion laws on the books. We have proudly stood with RTL and conservative values, and always will.

Recently, the RCN assisted RTL in a pro-life mission. We reached out to friends and individual nations across NationStates, endeavoring to recruit additional support to accomplish our mission goals. When the LCN heard that we had contacted individuals within their region with the pro-life plea, they immediately ordered their citizens to cease and desist from even allowing such invitations to be heard.

Additionally, they came to the FCN RMB, a RMB of a region that has helped lead the pro-life effort on NationStates, espousing beliefs that are antithetical to a pro-life ethic and lying about the FCN and the character of FCN/RCN members.

Despite their name, the LCN is not conservative. They can not be relied on to fight for conservatism. They will not fight for conservatism.

In the finale of C.S. Lewis' The Chronicles of Narnia, there was a climatic battle between the true Narnians, quislings collaborating with a foreign foe, and Narnian dwarfs. While the Narnian king and his supporters were engaged in a losing fight with the Calormene foes, the dwarfs sat idly by, refusing to lift a finger in assistance. "The dwarfs are for the dwarfs!" they cried, launching periodic attacks into both Narnians and Calormenes. In the end, their refusal to assist those who were their most natural allies ended in their own destruction, as well as the end of Narnian rule.

This is what the LCN has become. Whatever they once might have been, they are no longer friends to the conservative cause.

In the words of Saint Paul, "Come out from among them, and be ye separate". Reject the LCN. Come carry on the legacy and heritage of the FCN by moving to and taking part in the RCN. Take up the banner of Conservatism and help us take up the noble fight.

Brothers! Lend us your might! The Republic of Conservative Nations will welcome you with open arms! Together we can carry on the legacy of the Federation of Conservative Nations and move forward with steadfast resolve, dedicating ourselves to advancing conservatism and defending life and liberty. Join us, and reject those who would tarnish the memory of what the FCN once was!

New Waldensia
Former President, Delegate, etcetera, of the FCN
Current Chancellor of the RCN

Reminder, you are all welcome in the Republic of Conservative Nations, where pro-life and conservative values are fought for and defended.

Forum View

Ad From Max

Providence: The new novel by Max Barry, creator of NationStates