by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .14,48914,49014,49114,49214,49314,49414,495. . .27,76227,763»

Imperium Anglorum wrote:It was posted in the General Assembly forum a few days ago. It's provenance was independently confirmed. I'll also note that Misley (one of Caelapes' aliases) didn't claim that the telegram was fake or anything when challenged in the forum thread.

If this is the case, I may need to change my vote...

The New Nordic Union, Dizgovzy, The Champions League, and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Sicilian imperial-capitalist empire

Imperium Anglorum wrote:It was posted in the General Assembly forum a few days ago. It's provenance was independently confirmed. I'll also note that Misley (one of Caelapes' aliases) didn't claim that the telegram was fake or anything when challenged in the forum thread.

The secretariat also talked about how, while Caelapse didn't break any rules, that it didn't mean Caelapse did nothing wrong

The New Nordic Union, Poland-kaliningrad, and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Outer Sparta wrote:Your Grandness, what other reasons are there to not vote for Caelapes?

There aren't any. But for someone to win your vote, you should provide arguments as to why voting for that person is a good idea. I don't see any of such arguments; you haven't presented any reasons to vote for the incumbent at all. I'll also note that any arguments on policy are irrelevant and meaningless because the Secretary-General cannot implement or effect any such policies. They can only talk about them.

Attempting to abuse power is a reason not to vote for someone: especially when authority over the General Assembly and Security Council are held by GenSec and the moderators, respectively. That attempting to abuse power was not successful is meaningless semantics.

The New Nordic Union, Miharr, Poland-kaliningrad, and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Imperium Anglorum wrote:There aren't any. But for someone to win your vote, you should provide arguments as to why voting for that person is a good idea. I don't see any of such arguments; you haven't presented any reasons to vote for the incumbent at all. I'll also note that any arguments on policy are irrelevant and meaningless because the Secretary-General cannot implement or effect any such policies. They can only talk about them.

Attempting to abuse power is a reason not to vote for someone: especially when authority over the General Assembly and Security Council are held by GenSec and the moderators, respectively. That attempting to abuse power was not successful is meaningless semantics.

I didn't say I support the incumbent. I'm taking a look at all the other candidates.

Miharr and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Outer Sparta wrote:I didn't say I support the incumbent. I'm taking a look at all the other candidates.

Framing an election decision in the terms of 'why else should someone not vote for X' is to frame X as the default choice.

Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Post self-deleted by Alienage.

Vieternozsk wrote:National West Antarian Union Hi

And Bakalrussia hey also

Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Poland-kaliningrad

Vieternozsk wrote:And Bakalrussia hey also

Whst are you doing, Vieternozsk?

Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Miharr wrote:I’ll say, I am also digging Trans anarcho-communist lesbian catgirls, but since Caelapes has a good platform I voted for them.

Literally nothing in that platform could be accomplished.

The New Nordic Union, Alienage, and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Alienage wrote:También

I changed my vote back to Trans anarcho-communist lesbian catgirls because it was brought to my attention some of the corrupt things Caelapes has said

The New Nordic Union, Rivierenland, Libertandonien, Alienage, and 1 otherPoland-kaliningrad

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Framing an election decision in the terms of 'why else should someone not vote for X' is to frame X as the default choice.

Your Grandness, can you please translate that?

Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Literally nothing in that platform could be accomplished.

And I didn’t know until a few minutes ago that the position was an April fools joke

Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Poland-kaliningrad wrote:Whst are you doing, Vieternozsk?

What I am paying tribute to one of my Former nations Bakalrussia and one of my former regions the NWAU :D

Poland-kaliningrad and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Poland-kaliningrad

Miharr wrote:And I didn’t know until a few minutes ago that the position was an April fools joke

Wait, its actually? Oh. I thought people were joking about the April fools thing. Guess that makes me an April Fool..

The Champions League, Miharr, and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Miharr wrote:And I didn’t know until a few minutes ago that the position was an April fools joke

I do like partaking in this election news stuff, but it's all just April Fools anyway. No Idi Amin this cycle though...

The Champions League, Miharr, and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

The world capitalist confederation

The North Pacific

I'm a candidate for Secretary-General - AMA!

Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

In city-states which have themselves as their capital, the average location of every person living there is in the capital city.

Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Post self-deleted by Alienage.

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Because she's a decent person and decently likely to win based on current vote tallies.

Given Ecclestia is a former European I would have thought we would support him...

Anyway, I still intend to
Go Ecclestia!

Ecclestia, Feria-Alkaline, St Scarlett, The Champions League, and 2 othersRivierenland, and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Outer Sparta wrote:Your Grandness, can you please translate that?

If you ask 'Why shouldn't I vote for X?' it gives the impression that the normal thing to do is to vote for X.

St Scarlett and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

Alienage wrote:https://youtu.be/jSPpRB0j1dY

It’s still a communist 🙄

The New Nordic Union, The Champions League, Rivierenland, Alienage, and 1 otherPeaceful bosnia and herzegovina

The Poland-Lithuania Commonwealth wrote:Given Ecclestia is a former European I would have thought we would support him...

Anyway, I still intend to
Go Ecclestia!

A CENTRIST? Poliet, I am disappointed.

Ecclestia, The Poland-Lithuania Commonwealth, Yahlia, The Champions League, and 4 othersRivierenland, Miharr, Poland-kaliningrad, and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

The New Nordic Union wrote:A CENTRIST? Poliet, I am disappointed.

I know, I know, f*ck the centrists...
But I like Ecclestia 😊

Ecclestia, The New Nordic Union, Yahlia, The Champions League, and 3 othersRivierenland, Miharr, and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

The New Nordic Union wrote:If you ask 'Why shouldn't I vote for X?' it gives the impression that the normal thing to do is to vote for X.

I didn't vote for him anyway. I just wanted to question the Right Honourable.

Miharr and Peaceful bosnia and herzegovina

«12. . .14,48914,49014,49114,49214,49314,49414,495. . .27,76227,763»

Advertisement