IWK supreme court

Tbh I actually do feel a lot of remorse and resent my former self for committing such actions. Even if I don’t get unbanned, I would just like to note that I’ve changed since then. Found Christ and recently helped TVE by doing an rp recruitment plan which was successful, bolstering regional activity. I also apologize for the unprofessional attitude displayed in the post. Last night I was feeling under the weather and just wrote something up rq before I went to bed. My past doesn’t define my present. All I ask is for forgiveness.

BCC 30 wrote:

If you wish to get unbanned, you need to get an RO to support your appeal. KOE saying to appeal to the Court is not support, you need to get a RO to fully be willing to defend you and argue for you. A good example is Untecna’s case, where he got Wooloos to argue for him and fully support him.

If you manage to do this, then ping me. Otherwise, your case is invalid until then, and will be thrown out.

Actually he can't appeal unless he gets permission from every RO. if you read my statment (I was pinged),

He commited a Level 5 Offense (Real Crime, Exposure of Minors to Lewd Content, and another that I won't mention. but...CP)

"Level IV Violations are defined as the willful commission of a real crime while operating within the region.

Though punishment of these actions may no longer be within the region’s jurisdiction, and may instead be transferred to the oversight of sitewide moderation, any RO within the region active at the time of the commission of a Level IV Violation may automatically sanction a long ban of the maximum possible duration for the offending nation without requiring the authority or permission of the Supreme Court."
According to the new code of conduct. "

"Once the duration of a long ban is set by the Supreme Court, it may no longer be modified, and the offending nation must serve the mandated month/s in full, after which they may undergo a process of appeals. Those convicted of a Level IV violation require the permission of all incumbent ROs before pursuing their appeal."

Although Im obviously unable to rule on this matter. I'm sure this fits.

NS Oversimplified wrote:

Tbh I actually do feel a lot of remorse and resent my former self for committing such actions. Even if I don’t get unbanned, I would just like to note that I’ve changed since then. Found Christ and recently helped TVE by doing an rp recruitment plan which was successful, bolstering regional activity. I also apologize for the unprofessional attitude displayed in the post. Last night I was feeling under the weather and just wrote something up rq before I went to bed. My past doesn’t define my present. All I ask is for forgiveness.

I would like to say that just because you found christ or say you have changed doesn't cast aside the actions you committed which is against the law in nearly every country on this planet. In my books, you are unforgivable. I will never vouch for you.

Kingdom Of Englands wrote:

He was banned under different legislation.
I was under the impression that anyone can be unbanned under old rules if they committed them under said rules?
(Been to work so haven't had time to look at the law)
Can MLGDogeland, Orange Creek, Boris Cult advise please.
Don't want a repeat of mistakes made by Untecna's case

Nowhere in the current judicial laws does it say that.
You're probably thinking about when we revised previous indefinite bans after A-18.