«12. . .1,4131,4141,4151,4161,4171,4181,419. . .2,6822,683»
Dizanne
Satherland islands, World Trade, Islonia, Titanne, and 4 othersCreckelenney, Emazia, Lamontica, and Bahnhof
New NS ship? 👀
Satherland islands, Korsinia, World Trade, Titanne, and 4 othersKrestonien, Creckelenney, Emazia, and Bahnhof
How to fall asleep when people will be setting off fireworks all night:
Noise-canceling headphones on top of earplugs
OwO
Korsinia and Creckelenney
They’ve kept going for over 5 hours now. Sounds like some of our neighbors bought several million dollars worth of fireworks
they are happing as I type and car alrams are going off
4th of July always reminds me of the fact that our equivalent in the UK commemorates the day some dudes tried to kill the king 400 years ago.
World Trade, Andusre, Titanne, Shoila, and 2 othersLamontica, and Castarilia
Well, what else do we have to celebrate, maybe the passage of the magna carta or something?
The closest equivalent we have to the Declaration of Independence would probably be the 1801 Act of Union which created the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. But it's not such a momentous occasion that warrants celebration like the Declaration of Independence given that the UK was already around for almost 100 years before that, and the constituent nations have existed in some form for hundreds of years.
Sorry for double post
Re the House debate: adding 'intention to commit a crime' to the law registry seems to me like a bad idea. It's impossible to prove what someone's intentions are, even when they seem obvious. It can't be illegal to fantasise about committing a crime, it can only be illegal to actually commit a crime (or in the case of conspiracy, to actively plan and prepare a crime and share this with others). If someone creates detailed plans about how they would commit a crime, it may well seem that they intend to do it, but that's impossible to prove. I distinguish this from conspiracy and incitement, both of which also do not involve the perpetrator actually committing a crime themselves, because both of those actions actively encourage others to commit crimes. A conspirator can argue that they never had any intention to follow through with their plans, just as someone who creates plans for their own private consumption could, but they cannot argue with complete confidence that none of their conspirators intended to follow through either.
'Intention to commit a crime' seems to me like something that could never be proven without a high level of subjectivity and which risks persecuting people for their thoughts rather than their actions. As long as the individual in question never shares their plans with anyone else, or carries them out themself, they cannot be guilty of any crime in my opinion.
Pap sculgief and Islonia
Have a good day, Thaecia! I am having a great one!
World Trade, Sullheim, and Castarilia
Well, Corbyn isn't the labour leader anymore, so I doubt we'll be getting them any time soon.
Pap sculgief, The Bigtopia, Emazia, and Castarilia
Sorry didn't tell you to expect criticism and negatives in the thing I'm writing, please do not take it personally.
Let's see if Starmer agrees with it in 2024.
World Trade and Castarilia
That's totally fine, wouldn't want to impede on your creativity.
p→q
Thank you!
q—>r
Glad someone is
Dizgovzy, Satherland islands, and Poronihia Nui
Awwww, things not going well today?
:(
World Trade, Pap sculgief, Emazia, and Lamontica
Today’s the viewing for my uncle who died on Monday. I’m not looking forward to it
Taungu, Satherland islands, Korsinia, World Trade, and 9 othersThe marconian state, Titanne, Broustan, The Bigtopia, Emazia, Poronihia Nui, Shoila, Marvinville, and Castarilia
«12. . .1,4131,4141,4151,4161,4171,4181,419. . .2,6822,683»
Advertisement