by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Thaecia Board

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .1,5491,5501,5511,5521,5531,5541,555. . .1,6541,655»

Korsinia wrote:Good
Hand em over
This is where "gut you like a fish" comes in

Your kinda weird mate

Isle of Hocroabulle wrote:Your kinda weird mate

Godsinia isn't weird, end of story

I agree

Pap Sculgief wrote:Godsinia isn't weird, end of story

Yeah he is Pap

Don't spam, Isle of Hocroabulle. I have told u previously as well.

New thing coming from the Culture Ministry Soon????

Pap Sculgief wrote:Godsinia isn't weird, end of story

Yeah he is Pap

Indian Genius wrote:Don't spam, Isle of Hocroabulle. I have told u previously as well.

I'm not. Also gotta love I'm the one whose told not to spam when someone legit just posted Beesechurger

I can't believe that you liberals would ruin the mature conversation that we are supposed to have on this game.
Such a shame.

Brototh wrote:I can't believe that you liberals would ruin the mature conversation that we are supposed to have on this game.
Such a shame.

smh Dannet took possession of Thot, we need to free him

Brototh wrote:I can't believe that you liberals would ruin the mature conversation that we are supposed to have on this game.
Such a shame.

RL CONSEQUENCES have already been initiated.

If you haven't already please vote in this poll!
https://forms.gle/8i4sRxVFyoA81NaW8

If any of you need me I'll be at Conquista Cafe drowning my sorrows in Cranberry Juice.

Korsinia wrote:Yoyoyoyoyoyo
A few questions for everyone!

What's your stance on a regional military and who'll be in charge of it?
Should we run it for defense, raiding or both?
furthermore, would you want all military alliances Thaecia engages in to be reviewed and ratified by Congress?
Could you see Thaecia protecting other regions who are weak, unstable or consent to it for whatever reason they may have?

Thanks for your time :D

- Foreign Affairs Minister Korsinia

Andusre wrote:I oppose raiding, but am open to a defensive military. I would like to see it approved by Congress. Protection of other regions is a risky game to play, and needs some more definition.

Hm, well, right now we really need our numbers and WA endorsements. Defending takes away from that and whereby it may hurt our embassy regions, as seen with the recent SP raid the international community will come by if it is a region of note. We need to focus on strengthening our domestic stance.

But if we do redo the military I'll lead it.

Dizgovzy wrote:Hm, well, right now we really need our numbers and WA endorsements. Defending takes away from that and whereby it may hurt our embassy regions, as seen with the recent SP raid the international community will come by if it is a region of note. We need to focus on strengthening our domestic stance.

But if we do redo the military I'll lead it.

Diz it was a year ago lmfao

But what I think is this: we should have a defensive military, which only raids against regions that have attacked us or particularly, to put it one way, toxic regions.

Dizgovzy wrote:If any of you need me I'll be at Conquista Cafe drowning my sorrows in Cranberry Juice.

Conquista Cafe picks up another satisfied customer!

Dizgovzy wrote:Hm, well, right now we really need our numbers and WA endorsements. Defending takes away from that and whereby it may hurt our embassy regions, as seen with the recent SP raid the international community will come by if it is a region of note. We need to focus on strengthening our domestic stance.

But if we do redo the military I'll lead it.

Keep us neutral, that's what we should do. I have no doubt of our capabilities as a region to defend, but we are a government-based region and we should stay like that. Anyway, keeping voting power in the WA is also important, if we made an army we would lose endorsements and some voting power.

I largely agree with you on this one.

Prussian Sail Nation wrote:Keep us neutral, that's what we should do. I have no doubt of our capabilities as a region to defend, but we are a government-based region and we should stay like that. Anyway, keeping voting power in the WA is also important, if we made an army we would lose endorsements and some voting power.

I largely agree with you on this one.

I was quoting a convo from like 15 months ago but ok XD

Emazia wrote:Diz it was a year ago lmfao

But what I think is this: we should have a defensive military, which only raids against regions that have attacked us or particularly, to put it one way, toxic regions.

How do you even raid? I feel really dumb saying that.

Isle of Hocroabulle wrote:How do you even raid? I feel really dumb saying that.

Raiding is pretty fun! I've done it for over a year! To keep it short, raiding involves a group of people sending WA puppets to a region with no founder in order to seize the World Assembly Delegacy

Oh. Like card trading? I mean, in the use of puppets at least.

Isle of Hocroabulle wrote:Oh. Like card trading? I mean, in the use of puppets at least.

I wouldn't describe it like that loll. But there is a lot of puppet creating in raids. A while ago, I participated in a raid that raided over 100 regions

«12. . .1,5491,5501,5511,5521,5531,5541,555. . .1,6541,655»

Advertisement