A lot of regulatory laws have been repealed at the WA reasently, does anybody know why?

There’s a difference between a good theorist and general and a good leader. While trotsky was certainly a good theorist and general, he was no leader. If he led the soviet union, he would’ve done the heavy industrialization just like stalin (probably killed a similar amount of people with a negligible difference between the killings of the two) and like I said before, trotsky would’ve dragged the soviet union into war much quicker before it was ready. Additionally, in our timeline it was Germany who invaded the soviet union meaning germany was the aggressor and the soviet union was the defender. Generally in warfare, the side that is defending gets more international sympathy than the aggressor meaning that countries like the UK, and more importantly the US were willing to side with the soviet union during that conflict. However, if trotsky was in charge, he would’ve been the aggressor of any conflict as a means to spread the revolution. This would’ve meant countries would’ve less willing to side with the soviet union and let’s be real, if they invade like poland for example, Germany, France, the UK, Czechoslovakia and even the US probably would’ve all declared war on the soviet union which would’ve meant the war would’ve been the soviet union vs the world, and while the soviets maybe could resist in the short term, could not sustain a war on this scale in the long term.

Ok so while yes Trotsky did believe in the idea of Permanent revolution I doubt hw would've started a major war in Europe that early on. The earliest I could see him starting such a war would be the late 1930s or early 1940s before then he would've supported the various Socialist movements in Europe much more than Stalin did.

Orquestralia

The Hey TCB It's Dad of Namwenia

34 days ago

South-Western Africa wrote:

A lot of regulatory laws have been repealed at the WA reasently, does anybody know why?

Short Answer: A lot of them are older resolutions which could use a refresh / update. However, the GA does not allow for amendments to existing resolutions, so the only way to update them is to repeal them and replace them with something new.

The New Islands of Fredonia, The New Liberated California, Estados Socialistas Unidos de Iberia, and Bobismh

The People's Republic of TCB Ministry of World Assembly Affairs

34 days ago

Edited

The Ministry of World Assembly Affairs has released new dispatches on the at-vote for the Security Council and General Assembly!

Security Council
Proposal: Declaration On Diplomacy
Voting Page Link: page=sc
Official Recommendation: AGAINST

Vote AGAINST Declaration on Diplomacy

by The People's Republic of TCB Ministry of World Assembly Affairs

Official Recommendation of the Ministry of WA Affairs

Vote AGAINST Declaration on Diplomacy - Here

Category: DeclarationType: DeclareAuthor: The Hill Republic

Rationale & Analysis

No, just no.

The SC shall not provide fascist, racist, and homophobic regions immunity from raids. Nor should the SC encourage sanctions against those who raid and destroy those regions. Respect for regional sovereignty ends when support of hateful or fascist ideologies begins in said region. Do better.

As such, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs has directed Kethania to vote AGAINST Declaration on Diplomacy, and urges the Bloc's World Assembly nations to do the same.

Analysis By: Suthanimark

Want more information? Please telegram Minister of World Assembly Affairs Namwenia for further clarification.
Want to give your input on proposals like these? Join our discussion on Discord!
Thank you for reading.

Read dispatch

General Assembly
Proposal: Repeal: Nuclear Waste Safety Act
Voting Page Link: page=ga
Official Recommendation: FOR

Vote FOR Repeal: Nuclear Waste Safety Act

by The People's Republic of TCB Ministry of World Assembly Affairs

Official Recommendation of the Ministry of WA Affairs

Vote FOR Repeal: Nuclear Waste Safety Act - Here

Category: RepealResolution: GAR#116Author: Tinhampton

Rationale & Analysis

Ready for the 5th repeal in a row!

Unlike the previous repeal, Repeal: “Nuclear Waste Safety Act” has simple, logical reason for the attempt. GA #116, the target, has incredibly inconsistent language. It refers alternates references to nuclear waste as international nuclear waste and international waste. This leads an odd situation where the plain language of the resolution states that a nation that has no capability to store nuclear waste could be banned from importing other waste products, such as food waste, from other countries. Obviously, a nation's ability handle nuclear waste has no impact on their ability handle other wastes.

As such, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs has directed Kethania to vote FOR Repeal: Nuclear Waste Safety Act, and urges the Bloc's World Assembly nations to do the same.

Analysis By: Suthanimark

Read dispatch

The SC proposal basically says, "All raiding is bad, even if the target is a fascist, racist, homophobe, etc." So, hard no on that one. The GA proposal is a repeal that noticed some nuanced, bad language that because of poor word choice, a member state that can't handle nuclear waste can't receive any other waste into their country.

If you have any questions about this dispatch or the Ministry's work, - or wish to join the Ministry, - please do not hesitate to contact the First Minister (Namwenia) via telegram or Discord DMs, until we have a new Minister of World Assembly Affairs. Thank you!