You see... Civilians may not like it, but it may be the best for the country. As such, lets say that people have to many rights, and are starting rebellions, dictatorship is best. Here is a better example: A country that needs a Strong Leader also need one who has Power, as in Getting rid of most of there Rights. Maybe its because they need system to know what issue is important. Maybe they need to do their work for their Country. Whatever the case its usually the dictatorship that is better. Here is the best Example: For Instance, maybe you are trying to make you country better by making more and better policies. But, you invade some countries and the Democratic Senate and country that you are working for doesn't like that, you then lose all of your political Popularity, and all your great policies go out the window, so with communism or a Dictatorship you have Power. Power that you can use for Good Policies or Bad Polices.
Wait, what do you mean, because of the slaves and Yascelists problem?
Why do citizens of the North Pacific have to be active? It’s kinda stupid, but that’s just my opinion.
05-1: No, and put the gun down or one of my snipers will kill you.
Well, if you check the introduction or help page, you might see that Pacific regions are quite spammy and chatty
Exactly. You may be a Communist or a Dictator but in the end you probably end up helping your country. Most of the time.
Dear Monarch of Germany,
I wish for you to join the Yamastian Pact, one of the eldest religions in the world.
Monotheistic if you care to know.
Emperor Ashkenzic IV
Our language is more straight and harder but fluent to learn, you also need the Acaian accent
All hail freedom
onse donse tronse
Wat Is It? :O
Hello, Quarantine is making me each potato chips for breakfast lunch and dinner, and makimg me forget everything I know, and my Uncle is a Prankster so it's impossible to forget him.