«12. . .3,7363,7373,7383,7393,7403,7413,742. . .8,7438,744»
"Commander Lürssen we have received your transmission and request to enter through this fine military blockade and unless we receive orders otherwise we have no reason to allow for your passage through this blockade you must take that up with our leader not with us. Until further notice you will not be allowed to cross this blockade and if you get any closer to our fleet we will have to open fire for the safety of our fleet. we will make quick work of your ships. If you try to run our blockade you will be met with a 15in shell that will punch straight through your command tower."
Leonism, Cossack Peoples, and Loftegen 3
There's an interview with him in the latest gazette actually with a bit of information on that. ^-^
Although presumably he was an acceptable Minister of the Interior, I think most of the acclaim that led to him being elected delegate was from his work with defending, maybe not Laz itself so much. As someone who used to work under him in The Order of the Grey Wardens, I can bear witness to how he has built up and improved defender operations so much.
Fluffiness and Loftegen 3
The people of Loftegen 3 prefer the term 'nuclear catastrophe', since 'apocalypse' means to reveal knowledge (Loftegenans can be a bit pedantic at times). As to the generation of nuclear devices, Loftegen 3 is on generation five, and working on six. A tiny handful of gen 3 devices are still in the inventory, along with a significant number of gen 4 devices (about 15% of all weapons).
As a somewhat related aside, 'The Big One' by Stuart Slade is all about a one-sided nuclear attack. It's not the best written book ever, dialogue not being his strong suit at the time, but he did get better over time. He revisits the idea in 'Ride of the Valkyries' set about 25 years later.
Satanic empire, Greater catarapania, and Leonism
I see you're a man of culture as well
Your imaginary friend, Cossack Peoples, and Loftegen 3
At the yield scales we're discussing here, prompt radiation>blast>thermal effects. For large nuclear weapons (tens or hundreds of kilotons) it's the other way around, thermal effects dominate blast and radiation, and you get massive fires. Fourth gens would be more or less comparable to a multi-tonne conventional explosive crossed with a scaled-down neutron bomb - though my nation uses boron-10 to "blast enhance" the weapons (and decrease radiation output) where possible.
PLUTO was an open-cycle solid core. A closed cycle gas core NTR is an entirely different ballgame. There are two key differences for our purposes: lack of fallout in the exhaust, and higher specific impulse. With methane propellant for work outside of the atmosphere, and a mass ratio of two, the platform would be able to make a suborbital hop with the airbreathing engines, release k-rods, then have enough propellant onboard to literally reverse course (think ~18 km/s delta-vee). It never has to pass over enemy territory.
Yes, but in kinetic weaponry. The goal would be to force the rest of the world into an arms race that would make "strategic" nuclear weapons obsolete, meaning ordinary civilians no longer have to live with the Sword of Damocles over their heads.
This is true, but taking out silos reduces the total nuclear arsenal available to the enemy, which decreases the odds of my ballistic missile defense systems being saturated.
Fair. We're jackasses, and upfront about it, so we don't exactly have the right to complain about pedants.
Gen one was the first pure fission atomic bombs. Gen two was thermonuclear warheads. Gen three includes things like variable yield, nuclear shaped charges (still used by Catarapania fairly extensively), bomb-pumped x-ray lasers, and neutron bombs. All of these can be built using modern technology. Fourth generation weapons are PMT.
Gen four would be small (subkiloton) devices using subcritical masses of fissile material (if any) and/or other exotic techniques to kickstart fusion. These could be fairly easily modified to take advantage of the advances made by third generation weapons, and would be tactical, rather than strategic, in nature. They would be far more potent than chemical explosives, yet nevertheless be three orders of magnitude less powerful than the smallest efficient nuclear weapons we have today, allowing them to be used in relatively good conscience.
It's that last point that makes fourth gens attractive to Catarapania. We're a fairly militaristic nation, but we respect the principles of proportionality and distinction in all of our operations. Being able to harness the power of the atom without killing thousands of innocent civilians in the process is a huge boon, especially when we're outnumbered or need to eliminate an entrenched enemy.
We're curious what a fifth generation nuclear weapon would look like, given what's been said already.
I'll bear that in mind.
Aigania, Northern westwald, and Loftegen 3
I dunno, just got back from watchin a physics video with some classmates. :o
Treadwellia, Hyrule world, and Loftegen 3
«12. . .3,7363,7373,7383,7393,7403,7413,742. . .8,7438,744»
Advertisement