Post

Region: Thaecia

United cascadian peoples

Korsinia wrote:

We already have a precedent set regarding dragging officials to court for what is believed to have been unjust banning

This means that whether your bill explicitly states it or not
Representing a banned nation will be legal and the option open and with a precedent already set

I feel like fundamentally the entire bill achieves nothing new but only limit us for the sake of saying we legally banned fascism
Even if we OOC banned a nation the ability to challenge to ban still remains

So let me ask again
What exactly does this bill achieve?

Formalizes the policy of banning Fascists. That simple.

Context • Report