by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .31,88531,88631,88731,88831,88931,89031,891. . .79,75179,752»

Euricanis wrote:Slatos has challenged you to debate! What will you do?

1. Run away because you’re scared of losing
2. Debate because you’re scared of running
3. Collapse onto the floor because you’re scared of debating
4. Collapse onto your bed because the floor is dirty

5. ALL OF THE ABOVE

The angel of charity

The angel of charity

Shavara wrote:\ /
>->

*fite*

Rude.
Wins.

Wirrabuk wrote:Indeed : ) There is way too much focus and BS abt high IQ scores being a sign that kids will be superhuman. It's been correlated to slightly higher than normal successes in specific kinds of work that need a lot of logical thinking. Very, very selective jobs

There is no fighting from my side. One person is behaving like a drama queen here. Say their name, put the blame where it needs to be put. You can CLEARLY see their behavior isn't acceptable.

A big problem is that people want to start a discussion under good faith and then, suddenly, they go off the rails.. No one can know if someone's gonna go off the rails. It's a very normal discussion that someone decided to hijack with emotionally laden words. I'm not sure when but at some point RMB will have to decide if users who turn something logical into an emotional manipulative battle should be penalized.

None of you are served by pretending everyone is at fault. If one person is at fault, point out THAT fault. If both, point that out. If all three, do that.

You are fighting, and I am not pretending everyone is at fault. There were 5 people in this conversation, I'm shutting down the most problematic ones. If you dislike it, that's your problem. I won't tolerate passive aggressive bullshit, and I don't tolerate Syndicates drama either. If you can't see your issue, then that's something I can't help here.

Zukchiva, Shavara, Wirrabuk, Aivintis, and 2 othersBearStackof2015, and The death syndicate

Post self-deleted by The death syndicate.

Aivintis wrote:5. ALL OF THE ABOVE

Your brain has exploded from 4 conflicting choices!

You have fainted!

The angel of charity and Aivintis

Slatos wrote:Our Debate...

Will be memes

Wirrabuk:

Shavara, The angel of charity, Wirrabuk, Slatos, and 1 otherAivintis

The angel of charity wrote:Rude.
Wins.

:<
Oh no i lose

The angel of charity and Aivintis

The death syndicate

Im sorry if I am stubborn as a mule, short fused and very fragile.

The angel of charity, Aivintis, and Levantin

Ah yes

(TEP rmb)

Enslaved drama

The angel of charity and Aivintis

Post self-deleted by The death syndicate.

The death syndicate

aw, ok.

The angel of charity

The death syndicate wrote:

I need you to stop.

Shavara and Aivintis

Brethren wrote:"Oh, yeah, I'm fine." She smiles and cuddles a bit closer. Her voice is thinner than it should be, like it needs the sound of running water underneath it.
"Just thinking about another painting."

Jaden resists the urge to rub Esk's head, and settles for placing his hands on his abdomen. "What would it be about?"

The angel of charity, BearStackof2015, and Brethren

The death syndicate

The angel of charity wrote:I need you to stop.

ok. im just gonna listen to the doom soundtrack whilst killing tryhards.

The angel of charity

The angel of charity

The death syndicate wrote:ok. im just gonna listen to the doom soundtrack whilst killing tryhards.

Punish those tryhards, they need to learn to step away from the game.

Shavara

Slatos wrote:Our Debate...

Will be memes

<Prepares my Lenny brigade to destroy you>

The angel of charity wrote:Rude.
Wins.
You are fighting, and I am not pretending everyone is at fault. There were 5 people in this conversation, I'm shutting down the most problematic ones. If you dislike it, that's your problem. I won't tolerate passive aggressive bullshit, and I don't tolerate Syndicates drama either. If you can't see your issue, then that's something I can't help here.

I see no problem on my side, and I'always m direct. There is no 'passive aggressiveess' here : ) Using a word out of context does not make it correct. But I don't want things to be negative. So we will certainly move on. But this is bad moderation.

It's always bad, short sighted moderation to see as equivalent the aggressor and the one caught in the aggressor's weird need to argue. And ofc we know why it's done. It's done so the person asking people to 'back off' doesn't have to face criticism. But history shows it emboldens the ones who want to keep fighting.

It was a simple question of feedback, and I had no idea TDS would go in this weird direction. These things will happen, nothing too bad. I'm again surprised it took this strange turn.

Levantin wrote:Wirrabuk:

You're making it worse, Levantin. Let it go

Never reply when angry.

Never make a promise when happy.

Never make a decision when sad.

Wirrabuk

Wirrabuk wrote:<Prepares my Lenny brigade to destroy you>

I see no problem on my side, and I'always m direct. There is no 'passive aggressiveess' here : ) Using a word out of context does not make it correct. But I don't want things to be negative. So we will certainly move on. But this is bad moderation.

It's always bad, short sighted moderation to see as equivalent the aggressor and the one caught in the aggressor's weird need to argue. And ofc we know why it's done. It's done so the person asking people to 'back off' doesn't have to face criticism. But history shows it emboldens the ones who want to keep fighting.

It was a simple question of feedback, and I had no idea TDS would go in this weird direction. These things will happen, nothing too bad. I'm again surprised it took this strange turn.

You're making it worse, Levantin. Let it go

Prepare...

Wirrabuk, Aivintis, and Levantin

Wirrabuk wrote:<Prepares my Lenny brigade to destroy you>

I see no problem on my side, and I'always m direct. There is no 'passive aggressiveess' here : ) Using a word out of context does not make it correct. But I don't want things to be negative. So we will certainly move on. But this is bad moderation.

It's always bad, short sighted moderation to see as equivalent the aggressor and the one caught in the aggressor's weird need to argue. And ofc we know why it's done. It's done so the person asking people to 'back off' doesn't have to face criticism. But history shows it emboldens the ones who want to keep fighting.

It was a simple question of feedback, and I had no idea TDS would go in this weird direction. These things will happen, nothing too bad. I'm again surprised it took this strange turn.

You're making it worse, Levantin. Let it go

Just trying to defuse the situation with memes.

Wirrabuk and Aivintis

I'm off to play minecraft you noobs

Kampf Empire wrote:God, why do you refuse to take my life. I want to be able to sing three different voices for a Disney song, AND YOU REFUSE ME THAT RIGHT!

Let it go....let it go...???

Slatos wrote:Prepare...

<shudders in fear>

Please, no, meme mas-

Wait..

Prepare for imgur domination!

Levantin wrote:Just trying to defuse the situation with memes.

I'm sure you have good intentions, I just dunno if a meme battle will suddenly take me to a place where my real life face is:

o_O

Heck with it, let's have memes, Slatos

En garde!

Shavara wrote:

Whodunnit this time?

Zukchiva, Shavara, Aivintis, BearStackof2015, and 2 othersThe death syndicate, and Kalisari

The death syndicate wrote:Im sorry if I am stubborn as a mule, short fused and very fragile.

The number of people who have tagged me in this meme:

https://imgur.com/G2cBP9j

should also tag you :P

Wirrabuk wrote:<shudders in fear>

Please, no, meme mas-

Wait..

Prepare for imgur domination!

I'm sure you have good intentions, I just dunno if a meme battle will suddenly take me to a place where my real life face is:

o_O

Heck with it, let's have memes, Slatos

En garde!

You go first m8

Wirrabuk

«12. . .31,88531,88631,88731,88831,88931,89031,891. . .79,75179,752»

Advertisement