The North PacificBoard

haven't talked on here for a while ... how's everyone?

Ilirja wrote:

haven't talked on here for a while ... how's everyone?

Tired as always XD

Brevada wrote:

Good afternoon! ^_^
How is everyone doing today?

Hi

Praeceps wrote:

Pretty mixed, how are you?

I'm doing great! ^_^

Reorganized independent nevada wrote:

To simplify it I'm not going to rp with you anymore

what, because i already won the before war standoff and you were forced to back down from my absurd level of nukes? (that was also proven to be realistic and therefore not god modding) lol.

Angshire wrote:

Well, maybe you should just join SR. The people will likely stop calling you out for it.

i will this summer. also, nukes are not allowed in SR except for very particular situations so i cant use this tactic.

Trusseia wrote:

No, it was an asteroid, it landed in my country!

how big is it and is there anything special or particular about it? perhaps we'd like to buy it...

Volstokn wrote:

I mean, you really wouldn't need nukes on SR if you don't give people reasons to Invade. Since you have to give a proper casus belli, and still, new rules by the RMB RP moderation team have said you need someones permission to invade/ask if they are down for a war.

i know. i challenged him and he went along with it. finally, he decided to cancel the war before it actually begun and stoped invading a nation lol (that was my only "demand" in the war if he didnt want nuked in the rp)

*commits massive war crimes and massacres 5 million civilians at once casually*

Utopicican wrote:

i know. i challenged him and he went along with it. finally, he decided to cancel the war before it actually begun and stoped invading a nation lol (that was my only "demand" in the war if he didnt want nuked in the rp)

The thing to remember about SR RP is that the outcome of the war is not important. What matters is the RP itself, and the intricate details and storyline.

OOC Note - Had severe writer’s block, so this was the best I could compose for the time being. Sorry.

Reorganized independent nevada

Utopicican wrote:

well, ive heard others say they have some very strict nuke rules.

Because there really is no good reason to use nukes. It’s unrealistic and inhumane

Oclusia wrote:

Because there really is no good reason to use nukes. It’s unrealistic and inhumane

actually their very realistic and how i use them, incredibly humane. heres some math to prove them realistic for starters (this is a quoted telegram i sent to someone):
Actually I just found a sit saying 5.5 trillion, minimum. That means it’s not average. It’ll be more. Also, according to Wikipedia America created 70k nukes over the Cold War and I have a slightly better economy than America. Apparently due to farther research the Cold War technically lasted 45 years. Also don’t forget only 20% of America’s 1 trillion military budget was used on nukes. If I made that 60%, that’s 3 times the amount of nuke funding. I’d say based off a rough estimate that over 100 years I would get maybe 70k*3*2.22(that’s how much longer 100 years is that 45)=499,500 nukes more. That also leaves me with 40% left of 100 trillion or 40 trillion to spend on anti nukes and army’s lol.
----------------------------------- (end of telegram)

next off, if you use nukes as a deterrent and as our only weapon so any declaration of war on you is automatically nuclear war, so no one attacks. this also allows you to prevent unjust attacks on other nations as well as prevent world wars.

Norivna wrote:

karen i just wanted to kill some people plz stop

were pacifists but we don't allow warmongering! if you at least had a good reason for attacking, we wouldnt have intervenned but you were just attacking for greed. you attack in the name of greed, we will stop you by all means necessary.

Utopicican wrote:

were pacifists but we don't allow warmongering! if you at least had a good reason for attacking, we wouldnt have intervenned but you were just attacking for greed. you attack in the name of greed, we will stop you by all means necessary.

w h a t