Post

I share the same opinion as Chairman Fishergate. The House Committees Act, aside from being passed by both chambers multiple times, has barely had the time to show off it's full capabilities.

Everyone who argues to repeal the act always mention that one scenario that happened without taking into account that
1. This bill has not been a law for too long
2. Committee chairs run the committees differently.

I don't think one specific situation should be used as the underlying argument for repealing. Maybe this topic can be brought back up at a later date, but as of right now it is unfair to call the law ineffective or useless when it has barely had time to show off its efficiency and use.