3
Dispatch → Bulletin → WA Opinion
[URA] Vote FOR Repeal: “Condemn Greater Tezdrian”
Forum debateThe Security Council,
Recognizing the long years that have passed since SC#20 Condemn Greater Tezdrian took effect,
Understanding the historical significance of a resolution passed so early into this council’s existence,
Acknowledging that in the time since the passage of SC#20 the standards of condemnability have been raised by virtue of this council’s ever more outstanding authors,
Reasoning that a resolution passed so early into the existence of the Security Council must therefore not measure up to the standards of the present and should be evaluated at its own level,
Deciding that even by the standards of sixteen years ago SC#20 does not meet those criteria,
Noticing that the original resolution focuses on only a single action by Greater Tezdrian which it finds condemnable, the founding of IASEN, an organization dedicated to the promotion of slavery,
Believing that this single action in and of itself is not enough to deserve a condemnation, and should not have been enough even back when SC#20 was originally passed,
Confused that a majority of the original resolution’s content is not even dedicated to Greater Tezdrian, but is instead dedicated to a group of nations which have opposed IASEN, taking the time to name every nation and list every action taken by them,
Exhausted by the failure of the resolution to present any argument for condemnability,
Hereby repeals “Condemn Greater Tezdrian”.
This Security Council resolution was authored by
One Small Island and aims to repeal SCR#20, Condemn Greater Tezdrian.
This resolution seeks to repeal SCR#20, which condemned Greater Tezdrian due to its efforts to promote and support global slavery. As pointed out in the repeal, however, the condemnation is substandard, by both present and contemporary standards. The matters it objects to are facets of a single action by the condemned, and the URA agrees that such poor quality, even of a resolution so aged, should be repealed, thusly urging a vote FOR this resolution.
Arguments from members of the URA included:
Weighted turnout: 71.60%
Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.

















