The MaritimesBoard

Chocolate Lake wrote:

Except what does it matter, who really cares?

It’s only a game but we’ve got to care to make the game worthwhile.

Chocolate Lake wrote:

Spot on New York, we have nine more embassies than we should. :)

Except what does it matter, who really cares?

We should have an embassies policy for Hrstrovokia, or whoever is doing the job, to administer. Without guidelines how are they expected to operate?

May I suggest : We say no to raiders, nazis and embassy collectors. We say yes to those with whom we have an established relationship and common aims.”

That’s partly from Philosophers and partly from Gay Equality, apparently. I’d also add:

Is at least 1 month old
Has at least 10 nations, two of which are in the World Assembly
Has messages on the RMB newer than 15 days

What do you think Hrstrovokia, Toney River ?

Blue Narcissus wrote:

Wait a minute ! There’s something very fishy about Gell-Mannhattan all of sudden being first for everything. Check out their rankings, in the top 0.0004% for absolutely everything. Glitch or what?

Yeah actually that’s a bit nuts?

Blue Narcissus wrote:

We should have an embassies policy for Hrstrovokia, or whoever is doing the job, to administer. Without guidelines how are they expected to operate?

May I suggest : We say no to raiders, nazis and embassy collectors. We say yes to those with whom we have an established relationship and common aims.”

That’s partly from Philosophers and partly from Gay Equality, apparently. I’d also add:

Is at least 1 month old
Has at least 10 nations, two of which are in the World Assembly
Has messages on the RMB newer than 15 days

What do you think Hrstrovokia, Toney River ?

Seems fine from here. I'm all for being selective about the regions we associate with, but we're The Maritimes. We embody a kind and welcoming spirit and a culture of hospitality that goes back over two centuries.

I'm happy to welcome anybody that fits that theme and honestly wants to work with us.

How about this for our embassies policy?

We say no to raiders, nazis and collectors of embassies. We say yes to those with whom we have an established relationship and common aims.

Nous disons non aux pillards, aux nazis et aux collectionneurs d’ambassades. Nous disons oui à ceux avec qui nous entretenons une relation établie et des objectifs communs.

I’ve left out all the rest about that numbers of nations etc because if we have an established relationship, we have common objectives and want to exchange embassies, bureaucratic conditions shouldn’t get in the way.

Does this pass muster? Hrstrovokia, Dregonia, Blue Narcissus, anybody else ?

Bon vendredi et bonne journée à vous tous.

Safety: First: Kalix top 0.2%. Second: Dregonia top 0.3%. Third: Toney River top 0.4% … Middle: Marcistani top 5% … Last: Economic Invincibility bottom 0%

World first: Kindjal Groland
Eladen Klesh top 0.0006% (15th in world)
Nudist Dreamland Yannia top 0.2%
Gay Equality Quartzinne top 0.6%

In Bay Roberts, religious households enthusiastically use whips in private.

In Cybernetic Ultimate Hyena, members of majority races are forced out of their homes to make way for Bigtopians.

In Iantopiia, the blind lead the blind in social welfare.

In LSN37, citizens insist that there's no law against standing downwind when marijuana crops are burned off.

Toney River wrote:

How about this for our embassies policy?

We say no to raiders, nazis and collectors of embassies. We say yes to those with whom we have an established relationship and common aims.

Nous disons non aux pillards, aux nazis et aux collectionneurs d’ambassades. Nous disons oui à ceux avec qui nous entretenons une relation établie et des objectifs communs.

I’ve left out all the rest about that numbers of nations etc because if we have an established relationship, we have common objectives and want to exchange embassies, bureaucratic conditions shouldn’t get in the way.

Does this pass muster? Hrstrovokia, Dregonia, Blue Narcissus, anybody else ?

I like that. I can't speak for anyone else, of course, but my support is there.

Toney River wrote:

How about this for our embassies policy?

We say no to raiders, nazis and collectors of embassies. We say yes to those with whom we have an established relationship and common aims.

Nous disons non aux pillards, aux nazis et aux collectionneurs d’ambassades. Nous disons oui à ceux avec qui nous entretenons une relation établie et des objectifs communs.

I’ve left out all the rest about that numbers of nations etc because if we have an established relationship, we have common objectives and want to exchange embassies, bureaucratic conditions shouldn’t get in the way.

Does this pass muster? Hrstrovokia, Dregonia, Blue Narcissus, anybody else ?

I like the KISS principal, works for me.

Each Uisge wrote:

I like the KISS principal, works for me.

Generally true of all things.

I would just amend "nazis" to "fascists". Nazis is more of a generalization, and we do discourage any form of fascism on our shores. The only fascists we allow are lobsters. Tasty, tasty lobsters.

Business subsidisation: First: Hrstrovokia top 0.2%. Second: Iantopiia top 2%. Third: Economic Invincibility top 3% … Middle: Chayofa top 29% … Last: Charlottetown Islanders bottom 19%

World first: Grativalu Vickenian experiment containment zone
Eladen The CUD top 0.02% (43rd in world)
Nudist Dreamland Oktotheio top 2%
Gay Equality Otis-T top 2%

In Dregonia, multiple births are a cause of celebration for tax collectors.

Dregonia wrote:

Generally true of all things.

I would just amend "nazis" to "fascists". Nazis is more of a generalization, and we do discourage any form of fascism on our shores. The only fascists we allow are lobsters. Tasty, tasty lobsters.

Aha the word has been changed to fascists.

In our embassy collection we still seem to be collecting embassy collectors though.